TY - GEN
T1 - High power density reactor core design for civil nuclear marine propulsion. Part II
T2 - 2018 International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Reactor Physics Paving the Way Towards More Efficient Systems, PHYSOR 2018
AU - Alam, Syed Bahauddin
AU - Ridwan, Tuhfatur
AU - Parks, Geoff T.
AU - Almutairi, Bader
AU - Goodwin, C. S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 PHYSOR 2018. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - In this reactor physics study, we attempt to design a high power density core that fulfills the objective of providing ∼15 effective full-power-years life at 333 MWth using 19% 235U enriched micro-heterogeneous ThO2-UO2duplex fuel and 16% 235U enriched homogeneously mixed all-UO2fuel. We use W1MS to develop subassembly designs and PANTHER to examine whole-core arrangements. In a companion (Part I) paper, three core designs with power densities between 82 and 111 MW/m3were selected on the basis of achieving the target ∼15-year core lifetime. Our analyses in this paper (Part II) show that higher power density cases require less burnable absorber than lower power density cases for both candidate fuels. Reactivity coefficients [moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) and fuel temperature (Doppler) coefficient (FTC)] values for the higher power density cases are lower (more negative) than for the lower power density cores. In addition, higher power density cases exhibit higher axial offset (AO). It is observed that a duplex fuel lattice needs less burnable absorber than uranium-only fuel to achieve the same poison performance. MTC and FTC values of the duplex core are generally considerably more negative than those of the UO2core. It is possible to increase the power density by at least 30% above that for the reference core design (63 MW/m3) while satisfying the core neutronic safety constraints and providing a core life of ∼ 15 years. Ultimately the most successful design, in terms of whole-core neutronic performance, is the duplex core with an average power density of 120 MW/m3, which exhibits a reactivity swing of less than 4000 pcm, while obtaining a core life of ∼15 years. The average core power density is increased by ∼50% compared to the reference core design and now is equivalent to the Sizewell B PWR (101.6 MW/m3).
AB - In this reactor physics study, we attempt to design a high power density core that fulfills the objective of providing ∼15 effective full-power-years life at 333 MWth using 19% 235U enriched micro-heterogeneous ThO2-UO2duplex fuel and 16% 235U enriched homogeneously mixed all-UO2fuel. We use W1MS to develop subassembly designs and PANTHER to examine whole-core arrangements. In a companion (Part I) paper, three core designs with power densities between 82 and 111 MW/m3were selected on the basis of achieving the target ∼15-year core lifetime. Our analyses in this paper (Part II) show that higher power density cases require less burnable absorber than lower power density cases for both candidate fuels. Reactivity coefficients [moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) and fuel temperature (Doppler) coefficient (FTC)] values for the higher power density cases are lower (more negative) than for the lower power density cores. In addition, higher power density cases exhibit higher axial offset (AO). It is observed that a duplex fuel lattice needs less burnable absorber than uranium-only fuel to achieve the same poison performance. MTC and FTC values of the duplex core are generally considerably more negative than those of the UO2core. It is possible to increase the power density by at least 30% above that for the reference core design (63 MW/m3) while satisfying the core neutronic safety constraints and providing a core life of ∼ 15 years. Ultimately the most successful design, in terms of whole-core neutronic performance, is the duplex core with an average power density of 120 MW/m3, which exhibits a reactivity swing of less than 4000 pcm, while obtaining a core life of ∼15 years. The average core power density is increased by ∼50% compared to the reference core design and now is equivalent to the Sizewell B PWR (101.6 MW/m3).
KW - Axial offset (AO)
KW - Enrichment enhancement-zoning (HBL)
KW - High power density (HPD) core
KW - Radial form factor (RFF)
KW - Reactivity coefficient
KW - Reactivity swing
KW - Soluble-boron-free (SBF) design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055739785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055739785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85055739785
T3 - International Conference on Physics of Reactors, PHYSOR 2018: Reactor Physics Paving the Way Towards More Efficient Systems
SP - 58
EP - 69
BT - International Conference on Physics of Reactors, PHYSOR 2018
PB - Sociedad Nuclear Mexicana, A.C.
Y2 - 22 April 2018 through 26 April 2018
ER -