TY - JOUR
T1 - Heracles at the Y
AU - Sansone, David
N1 - Funding Information:
58 This is supported by the Aristotelian text (Top. 112b22-4) on which Alexander is commenting, 59 As far as I am aware, this fundamental point has been noted only by J.C. Rijlaarsdam, Platon iiber die Sprache (Utrecht 1978) 203. 60 According to Hermias, Alexander and Aristotle (n.58), Prodicus prescribed rather the use of f|8ovr| as the generic term, a practice to which Virtue adheres in her use of the words f|5ovf| (once), tj8ea9ai (once) and T\bx>q (11 times).
Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - The article seeks to show that, contrary to the standard view, the 'Choice of Heracles' preserved at Xen. Mem. 2.1.21-33 is not a summary or paraphrase, but is a very close approximation to the actual wording of Prodicus' epideixis. The language and style are shown to be uncharacteristic of Xenophon, and the fact that Prodicus' original was known to exist in both written and orally performed versions serves to explain why the piece is framed by language that disclaims strict accuracy in reproducing it. It is further shown that the way in which near-synonyms are used in the piece is not necessarily inconsistent with other evidence for Prodicus' practice: it is rather the personified character Vice whose usage conflicts with that of Prodicus himself and with that of the personification of Virtue. Finally, it is proposed that the 'Choice of Heracles' represented the contents, not of Prodicus' advanced teaching, but of the popular, cut-rate lecture intended for a general audience.
AB - The article seeks to show that, contrary to the standard view, the 'Choice of Heracles' preserved at Xen. Mem. 2.1.21-33 is not a summary or paraphrase, but is a very close approximation to the actual wording of Prodicus' epideixis. The language and style are shown to be uncharacteristic of Xenophon, and the fact that Prodicus' original was known to exist in both written and orally performed versions serves to explain why the piece is framed by language that disclaims strict accuracy in reproducing it. It is further shown that the way in which near-synonyms are used in the piece is not necessarily inconsistent with other evidence for Prodicus' practice: it is rather the personified character Vice whose usage conflicts with that of Prodicus himself and with that of the personification of Virtue. Finally, it is proposed that the 'Choice of Heracles' represented the contents, not of Prodicus' advanced teaching, but of the popular, cut-rate lecture intended for a general audience.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60949131163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60949131163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2307/3246154
DO - 10.2307/3246154
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:60949131163
SN - 0075-4269
VL - 124
SP - 125
EP - 142
JO - Journal of Hellenic Studies
JF - Journal of Hellenic Studies
ER -