Abstract
In 1997, Håstad showed NP-hardness of (1 - ε, 1/q + δ)-approximating Max-3Lin(Zq); however, it was not until 2007 that Guruswami and Raghavendra were able to show NP-hardness of (1 - ε, δ)-approximating Max-3Lin(Z). In 2004, Khot-Kindler-Mossel-O'Donnell showed UG-hardness of (1 - ε, δ)-approximating Max-2Lin(Zq) for q = q(ε,δ) a sufficiently large constant; however, achieving the same hardness for Max-2Lin(Z) was given as an open problem in Raghavendra's 2009 thesis. In this work, we show that fairly simple modifications to the proofs of the Max-3Lin(Zq) and Max-2Lin(Zq) results yield optimal hardness results over Z. In fact, we show a kind of "bicriteria" hardness: Even when there is a (1 - ε)-good solution over Z, it is hard for an algorithm to find a δ-good solution over Z, R, or Zm for any m ≥ q(ε, δ) of the algorithm's choosing.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 9 |
Journal | ACM Transactions on Computation Theory |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Hardness of approximation
- Large alphabet sets
- Max-2Lin
- Max-3Lin
- The unique games conjecture
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Theoretical Computer Science
- Computational Theory and Mathematics