Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting

Tracy E Sulkin, Adam F. Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study outlines a new paradigm for the investigation of the effects of deliberation on political decisions. Specifically, it uses the ultimatum game as a situation in which the opportunity to deliberate and the placement of this opportunity are experimentally manipulated. Structural factors, such as the players' roles and their ability to vote on the proposal being offered, are also manipulated as a basis for comparison. Two outcomes are examined: the games' allocations, and players' perceptions of fairness. After controlling for structural factors, deliberative opportunity creates a more equitable distribution of money and enhances fairness perceptions. However these results hold only when such an opportunity occurs before the proposal stage. Deliberative opportunity after the proposal stage has no discernible impact. A survey of participants found that their personal characteristics and political predispositions influence perceptions of fairness for proposers, but not for acceptors. These findings demonstrate the potential benefits of deliberation while highlighting the importance of the nature of its implementation in determining its level of success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)809-826
Number of pages18
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

deliberation
fairness
political decision
political influence
voter
money
paradigm
ability
Deliberation
Fairness
Surveys and Questionnaires
Players

Keywords

  • Experiments
  • Political deliberation
  • Ultimatum game

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Habermas in the Lab : A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting. / Sulkin, Tracy E; Simon, Adam F.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 12.2001, p. 809-826.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{39d88ce94f3949bb990854bc0219f1d8,
title = "Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting",
abstract = "This study outlines a new paradigm for the investigation of the effects of deliberation on political decisions. Specifically, it uses the ultimatum game as a situation in which the opportunity to deliberate and the placement of this opportunity are experimentally manipulated. Structural factors, such as the players' roles and their ability to vote on the proposal being offered, are also manipulated as a basis for comparison. Two outcomes are examined: the games' allocations, and players' perceptions of fairness. After controlling for structural factors, deliberative opportunity creates a more equitable distribution of money and enhances fairness perceptions. However these results hold only when such an opportunity occurs before the proposal stage. Deliberative opportunity after the proposal stage has no discernible impact. A survey of participants found that their personal characteristics and political predispositions influence perceptions of fairness for proposers, but not for acceptors. These findings demonstrate the potential benefits of deliberation while highlighting the importance of the nature of its implementation in determining its level of success.",
keywords = "Experiments, Political deliberation, Ultimatum game",
author = "Sulkin, {Tracy E} and Simon, {Adam F.}",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/0162-895X.00263",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "809--826",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Habermas in the Lab

T2 - A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting

AU - Sulkin, Tracy E

AU - Simon, Adam F.

PY - 2001/12

Y1 - 2001/12

N2 - This study outlines a new paradigm for the investigation of the effects of deliberation on political decisions. Specifically, it uses the ultimatum game as a situation in which the opportunity to deliberate and the placement of this opportunity are experimentally manipulated. Structural factors, such as the players' roles and their ability to vote on the proposal being offered, are also manipulated as a basis for comparison. Two outcomes are examined: the games' allocations, and players' perceptions of fairness. After controlling for structural factors, deliberative opportunity creates a more equitable distribution of money and enhances fairness perceptions. However these results hold only when such an opportunity occurs before the proposal stage. Deliberative opportunity after the proposal stage has no discernible impact. A survey of participants found that their personal characteristics and political predispositions influence perceptions of fairness for proposers, but not for acceptors. These findings demonstrate the potential benefits of deliberation while highlighting the importance of the nature of its implementation in determining its level of success.

AB - This study outlines a new paradigm for the investigation of the effects of deliberation on political decisions. Specifically, it uses the ultimatum game as a situation in which the opportunity to deliberate and the placement of this opportunity are experimentally manipulated. Structural factors, such as the players' roles and their ability to vote on the proposal being offered, are also manipulated as a basis for comparison. Two outcomes are examined: the games' allocations, and players' perceptions of fairness. After controlling for structural factors, deliberative opportunity creates a more equitable distribution of money and enhances fairness perceptions. However these results hold only when such an opportunity occurs before the proposal stage. Deliberative opportunity after the proposal stage has no discernible impact. A survey of participants found that their personal characteristics and political predispositions influence perceptions of fairness for proposers, but not for acceptors. These findings demonstrate the potential benefits of deliberation while highlighting the importance of the nature of its implementation in determining its level of success.

KW - Experiments

KW - Political deliberation

KW - Ultimatum game

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035619657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035619657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/0162-895X.00263

DO - 10.1111/0162-895X.00263

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035619657

VL - 22

SP - 809

EP - 826

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - 4

ER -