Guided-Processing Outperforms Duty-Cycling for Energy-Efficient Systems

Long N. Le, Douglas L Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Energy efficiency is highly desirable for sensing systems in the Internet of Things. A common approach to achieve low-power systems is duty cycling, where components in a system are turned OFF periodically to meet an energy budget. However, this paper shows that such an approach is not necessarily optimal in energy efficiency, and proposes guided processing as a fundamentally better alternative. The proposed approach offers: 1) explicit modeling of performance uncertainties in system internals; 2) a realistic resource consumption model; and 3) a key insight into the superiority of guided processing over duty cycling. Generalization from the cascade structure to the more general graph-based one is also presented. Once applied to optimize a large-scale audio sensing system with a practical detection application, empirical results show that the proposed approach significantly improves the detection performance (up to 1.7 times and 4 times reduction in false alarm and miss rate, respectively) for the same energy consumption, when compared with the duty-cycling approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7924310
Pages (from-to)2414-2426
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers
Volume64
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Energy efficiency
Processing
Energy utilization
Uncertainty
Internet of things

Keywords

  • Guided-processing
  • IoT
  • duty-cycling
  • energy-efficient systems
  • resource-aware optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Guided-Processing Outperforms Duty-Cycling for Energy-Efficient Systems. / Le, Long N.; Jones, Douglas L.

In: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, Vol. 64, No. 9, 7924310, 01.09.2017, p. 2414-2426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e6f288bb7314839be2d496090d7a5ba,
title = "Guided-Processing Outperforms Duty-Cycling for Energy-Efficient Systems",
abstract = "Energy efficiency is highly desirable for sensing systems in the Internet of Things. A common approach to achieve low-power systems is duty cycling, where components in a system are turned OFF periodically to meet an energy budget. However, this paper shows that such an approach is not necessarily optimal in energy efficiency, and proposes guided processing as a fundamentally better alternative. The proposed approach offers: 1) explicit modeling of performance uncertainties in system internals; 2) a realistic resource consumption model; and 3) a key insight into the superiority of guided processing over duty cycling. Generalization from the cascade structure to the more general graph-based one is also presented. Once applied to optimize a large-scale audio sensing system with a practical detection application, empirical results show that the proposed approach significantly improves the detection performance (up to 1.7 times and 4 times reduction in false alarm and miss rate, respectively) for the same energy consumption, when compared with the duty-cycling approach.",
keywords = "Guided-processing, IoT, duty-cycling, energy-efficient systems, resource-aware optimization",
author = "Le, {Long N.} and Jones, {Douglas L}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TCSI.2017.2690909",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "2414--2426",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers",
issn = "1549-8328",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guided-Processing Outperforms Duty-Cycling for Energy-Efficient Systems

AU - Le, Long N.

AU - Jones, Douglas L

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Energy efficiency is highly desirable for sensing systems in the Internet of Things. A common approach to achieve low-power systems is duty cycling, where components in a system are turned OFF periodically to meet an energy budget. However, this paper shows that such an approach is not necessarily optimal in energy efficiency, and proposes guided processing as a fundamentally better alternative. The proposed approach offers: 1) explicit modeling of performance uncertainties in system internals; 2) a realistic resource consumption model; and 3) a key insight into the superiority of guided processing over duty cycling. Generalization from the cascade structure to the more general graph-based one is also presented. Once applied to optimize a large-scale audio sensing system with a practical detection application, empirical results show that the proposed approach significantly improves the detection performance (up to 1.7 times and 4 times reduction in false alarm and miss rate, respectively) for the same energy consumption, when compared with the duty-cycling approach.

AB - Energy efficiency is highly desirable for sensing systems in the Internet of Things. A common approach to achieve low-power systems is duty cycling, where components in a system are turned OFF periodically to meet an energy budget. However, this paper shows that such an approach is not necessarily optimal in energy efficiency, and proposes guided processing as a fundamentally better alternative. The proposed approach offers: 1) explicit modeling of performance uncertainties in system internals; 2) a realistic resource consumption model; and 3) a key insight into the superiority of guided processing over duty cycling. Generalization from the cascade structure to the more general graph-based one is also presented. Once applied to optimize a large-scale audio sensing system with a practical detection application, empirical results show that the proposed approach significantly improves the detection performance (up to 1.7 times and 4 times reduction in false alarm and miss rate, respectively) for the same energy consumption, when compared with the duty-cycling approach.

KW - Guided-processing

KW - IoT

KW - duty-cycling

KW - energy-efficient systems

KW - resource-aware optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018860117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018860117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TCSI.2017.2690909

DO - 10.1109/TCSI.2017.2690909

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 2414

EP - 2426

JO - IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers

JF - IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers

SN - 1549-8328

IS - 9

M1 - 7924310

ER -