TY - JOUR
T1 - Growth, mortality, harvest, and cost-effectiveness of stocked channel catfish in a small impoundment
AU - Santucci, Victor J.
AU - Wahl, David H.
AU - Storck, Ted W.
N1 - We thank S. Stuewe, M. Sarti, and K. Cottrell of the Jake Wolf Memorial Fish Hatchery and A. Brandenburg of the Little Grassy Fish Hatchery for providing channel catfish fingerlings; and J. Mick, D. Burkett, and G. Tickachek for coordi- nating activities with the Illinois Department of Conservation. K. Brewer, D. Coates, J. Corcoran, J. Finck, R. Mauk, M. Mounce, T. Patterson, and S. Shasteen assisted with field collections and lab- oratory analyses. The manuscript was greatly im- proved by the reviews of D. Clapp, S. Eder, R. Larimore, R. Mauk, C. Mayer, D. Powell, T. Szen- drey, B. Whiteside, and the Aquatic Ecology Dis-cussion Group, Kaskaskia Biological Station. This study was supported in part by the Illinois Department of Conservation through Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration, Project F-51-R. Addition-al support was provided by the Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation.
PY - 1994/11
Y1 - 1994/11
N2 - We compared mortality and harvest of 200-mm and 250-mm channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus stocked in equal numbers for 4 years in an impoundment containing populations of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and bluegill Lepomis macrochirus. Based on a 5-year creel census, 52–92% of stocked fish were harvested. We found no difference between the stocked length-groups in terms of mean number caught (N = 365 for 200-mm and 392 for 250-mm fish), mean number harvested (66% for 200-mm and 83% for 250-mm fish), or mean total weight harvested (116 kg for 200-mm and 164 kg for 250-mm fish). Stocking mortality, largemouth bass predation, hooking mortality, and spillway escapement were low for both length-groups in all years. Harvest was the most important source of mortality in these populations. Growth rates were high, and within years did not differ between length-groups. High exploitation, fast growth, and low hooking mortality suggest length limits may be useful for deferring harvest of channel catfish in small impoundments until they reach a larger size. Based on analysis of cost effectiveness (catch and harvest/cost of stocking), the return on investment was similar for fish from both length-groups. Consequently, we do not recommend stocking channel catfish larger than 200 mm for most putgrow-and-take fisheries.
AB - We compared mortality and harvest of 200-mm and 250-mm channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus stocked in equal numbers for 4 years in an impoundment containing populations of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and bluegill Lepomis macrochirus. Based on a 5-year creel census, 52–92% of stocked fish were harvested. We found no difference between the stocked length-groups in terms of mean number caught (N = 365 for 200-mm and 392 for 250-mm fish), mean number harvested (66% for 200-mm and 83% for 250-mm fish), or mean total weight harvested (116 kg for 200-mm and 164 kg for 250-mm fish). Stocking mortality, largemouth bass predation, hooking mortality, and spillway escapement were low for both length-groups in all years. Harvest was the most important source of mortality in these populations. Growth rates were high, and within years did not differ between length-groups. High exploitation, fast growth, and low hooking mortality suggest length limits may be useful for deferring harvest of channel catfish in small impoundments until they reach a larger size. Based on analysis of cost effectiveness (catch and harvest/cost of stocking), the return on investment was similar for fish from both length-groups. Consequently, we do not recommend stocking channel catfish larger than 200 mm for most putgrow-and-take fisheries.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85047695392
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85047695392#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1577/1548-8675(1994)014<0781:GMHACE>2.3.CO;2
DO - 10.1577/1548-8675(1994)014<0781:GMHACE>2.3.CO;2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047695392
SN - 0275-5947
VL - 14
SP - 781
EP - 789
JO - North American Journal of Fisheries Management
JF - North American Journal of Fisheries Management
IS - 4
ER -