TY - JOUR
T1 - Group Decision Support Systems and Group Communication
T2 - A Comparison of Decision Making in Computer-Supported and Nonsupported Groups
AU - Poole, Marshall Scott
AU - Holmes, Michael
AU - Watson, Richard
AU - DeSanctis, Gerardine
PY - 1993/4
Y1 - 1993/4
N2 - This study investigated a range of impacts that a computerized group decision support system (GDSS) might have on group decision-making processes. A general model posited 13 possible GDSS impacts. The research strategy was to identify which of these impacts were likely to result for the specific GDSS and for the budget allocation task employed in this study and to focus on these in data collection and analysis. The design contrasted (a) groups using a computerized GDSS with (b) groups using a manual, paper-and-pencil version of the GDSS and with (c) baseline groups given no support system. GDSS impacts were measured by interaction analysis of group decision-making processes. Results partially supported our predictions and suggested some changes in the model. Results suggested that the GDSS improved the organization of the decision-making process but that it may have led to less thorough and critical discussion.
AB - This study investigated a range of impacts that a computerized group decision support system (GDSS) might have on group decision-making processes. A general model posited 13 possible GDSS impacts. The research strategy was to identify which of these impacts were likely to result for the specific GDSS and for the budget allocation task employed in this study and to focus on these in data collection and analysis. The design contrasted (a) groups using a computerized GDSS with (b) groups using a manual, paper-and-pencil version of the GDSS and with (c) baseline groups given no support system. GDSS impacts were measured by interaction analysis of group decision-making processes. Results partially supported our predictions and suggested some changes in the model. Results suggested that the GDSS improved the organization of the decision-making process but that it may have led to less thorough and critical discussion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21144480675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21144480675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/009365093020002002
DO - 10.1177/009365093020002002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:21144480675
SN - 0093-6502
VL - 20
SP - 176
EP - 213
JO - Communication Research
JF - Communication Research
IS - 2
ER -