TY - JOUR
T1 - Grey water footprints of U.S. thermoelectric power plants from 2010–2016
AU - Chini, Christopher M.
AU - Logan, Lauren H.
AU - Stillwell, Ashlynn S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Water demands for power generation within the energy-water nexus focus on both consumptive and withdrawn water for thermoelectric power plant cooling. However, the consumptive-based approach of water footprinting is incongruent with withdrawn water. Grey water footprints of thermoelectric power plants associated with thermal pollution offer a proxy method to integrate the consumptive (blue) water footprint concept with withdrawn water. In this study, we compute the monthly grey water footprints of thermoelectric power plants from 2010–2016 in the United States. The calculation of grey water footprint relies on return flow and temperature effluent data, which are available through the Energy Information Administration. However, in cases where these data are unavailable, we present a model for estimating grey water footprints based on fuel type, return flow, and generation. Grey water footprints show a peak in the winter and summer months with lower volumes in the spring and fall. Additionally, the national grey water footprint was 18% greater in 2016 than 2010 (408 km3 versus 347 km3), peaking in 2015 at 505 km3. Grey water footprints of electricity generally occur in the eastern area of the United States, where once-through cooling systems are most prevalent. We discuss the potential of grey water footprints as a policy tool for assessing aquatic ecosystem impacts of thermal pollution. Our study provides the first quantification of grey water footprints due to thermoelectric power plant pollution in the United States and provides a means of estimating grey water footprints with limited data.
AB - Water demands for power generation within the energy-water nexus focus on both consumptive and withdrawn water for thermoelectric power plant cooling. However, the consumptive-based approach of water footprinting is incongruent with withdrawn water. Grey water footprints of thermoelectric power plants associated with thermal pollution offer a proxy method to integrate the consumptive (blue) water footprint concept with withdrawn water. In this study, we compute the monthly grey water footprints of thermoelectric power plants from 2010–2016 in the United States. The calculation of grey water footprint relies on return flow and temperature effluent data, which are available through the Energy Information Administration. However, in cases where these data are unavailable, we present a model for estimating grey water footprints based on fuel type, return flow, and generation. Grey water footprints show a peak in the winter and summer months with lower volumes in the spring and fall. Additionally, the national grey water footprint was 18% greater in 2016 than 2010 (408 km3 versus 347 km3), peaking in 2015 at 505 km3. Grey water footprints of electricity generally occur in the eastern area of the United States, where once-through cooling systems are most prevalent. We discuss the potential of grey water footprints as a policy tool for assessing aquatic ecosystem impacts of thermal pollution. Our study provides the first quantification of grey water footprints due to thermoelectric power plant pollution in the United States and provides a means of estimating grey water footprints with limited data.
KW - Energy-water nexus
KW - Grey water footprints
KW - Thermal pollution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089436906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089436906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103733
DO - 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103733
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089436906
SN - 0309-1708
VL - 145
JO - Advances in Water Resources
JF - Advances in Water Resources
M1 - 103733
ER -