Grazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture

Nuria Gomez-Casanovas, Nicholas J. Delucia, Carl Bernacchi, Elizabeth H. Boughton, Jed P. Sparks, Samuel D. Chamberlain, Evan H Delucia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The impact of grazing on C fluxes from pastures in subtropical and tropical regions and on the environment is uncertain, although these systems account for a substantial portion of global C storage. We investigated how cattle grazing influences net ecosystem CO2 and CH4 exchange in subtropical pastures using the eddy covariance technique. Measurements were made over several wet-dry seasonal cycles in a grazed pasture, and in an adjacent pasture during the first three years of grazer exclusion. Grazing increased soil wetness but did not affect soil temperature. By removing aboveground biomass, grazing decreased ecosystem respiration (Reco) and gross primary productivity (GPP). As the decrease in Reco was larger than the reduction in GPP, grazing consistently increased the net CO2 sink strength of subtropical pastures (55, 219 and 187 more C/m2 in 2013, 2014, and 2015). Enteric ruminant fermentation and increased soil wetness due to grazers, increased total net ecosystem CH4 emissions in grazed relative to ungrazed pasture (27-80%). Unlike temperate, arid, and semiarid pastures, where differences in CH4 emissions between grazed and ungrazed pastures are mainly driven by enteric ruminant fermentation, our results showed that the effect of grazing on soil CH4 emissions can be greater than CH4 produced by cattle. Thus, our results suggest that the interactions between grazers and soil hydrology affecting soil CH4 emissions play an important role in determining the environmental impacts of this management practice in a subtropical pasture. Although grazing increased total net ecosystem CH4 emissions and removed aboveground biomass, it increased the net storage of C and decreased the global warming potential associated with C fluxes of pasture by increasing its net CO2 sink strength.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-572
Number of pages16
JournalEcological Applications
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

global warming
pasture
grazing
ecosystem
soil emission
ruminant
aboveground biomass
fermentation
cattle
productivity
soil
subtropical region
eddy covariance
tropical region
soil temperature
management practice
hydrology
respiration
environmental impact

Keywords

  • CH
  • cattle
  • flooded land
  • grassland
  • methane
  • net ecosystem CO exchange
  • net ecosystem productivity
  • pasture
  • subtropical
  • tropical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Grazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture. / Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria; Delucia, Nicholas J.; Bernacchi, Carl; Boughton, Elizabeth H.; Sparks, Jed P.; Chamberlain, Samuel D.; Delucia, Evan H.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 28, No. 2, 03.2018, p. 557-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria ; Delucia, Nicholas J. ; Bernacchi, Carl ; Boughton, Elizabeth H. ; Sparks, Jed P. ; Chamberlain, Samuel D. ; Delucia, Evan H. / Grazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture. In: Ecological Applications. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 557-572.
@article{9b6a1ebfb29348f981bd6d5c07af4cbd,
title = "Grazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture",
abstract = "The impact of grazing on C fluxes from pastures in subtropical and tropical regions and on the environment is uncertain, although these systems account for a substantial portion of global C storage. We investigated how cattle grazing influences net ecosystem CO2 and CH4 exchange in subtropical pastures using the eddy covariance technique. Measurements were made over several wet-dry seasonal cycles in a grazed pasture, and in an adjacent pasture during the first three years of grazer exclusion. Grazing increased soil wetness but did not affect soil temperature. By removing aboveground biomass, grazing decreased ecosystem respiration (Reco) and gross primary productivity (GPP). As the decrease in Reco was larger than the reduction in GPP, grazing consistently increased the net CO2 sink strength of subtropical pastures (55, 219 and 187 more C/m2 in 2013, 2014, and 2015). Enteric ruminant fermentation and increased soil wetness due to grazers, increased total net ecosystem CH4 emissions in grazed relative to ungrazed pasture (27-80{\%}). Unlike temperate, arid, and semiarid pastures, where differences in CH4 emissions between grazed and ungrazed pastures are mainly driven by enteric ruminant fermentation, our results showed that the effect of grazing on soil CH4 emissions can be greater than CH4 produced by cattle. Thus, our results suggest that the interactions between grazers and soil hydrology affecting soil CH4 emissions play an important role in determining the environmental impacts of this management practice in a subtropical pasture. Although grazing increased total net ecosystem CH4 emissions and removed aboveground biomass, it increased the net storage of C and decreased the global warming potential associated with C fluxes of pasture by increasing its net CO2 sink strength.",
keywords = "CH, cattle, flooded land, grassland, methane, net ecosystem CO exchange, net ecosystem productivity, pasture, subtropical, tropical",
author = "Nuria Gomez-Casanovas and Delucia, {Nicholas J.} and Carl Bernacchi and Boughton, {Elizabeth H.} and Sparks, {Jed P.} and Chamberlain, {Samuel D.} and Delucia, {Evan H}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/eap.1670",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "557--572",
journal = "Ecological Appplications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture

AU - Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria

AU - Delucia, Nicholas J.

AU - Bernacchi, Carl

AU - Boughton, Elizabeth H.

AU - Sparks, Jed P.

AU - Chamberlain, Samuel D.

AU - Delucia, Evan H

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - The impact of grazing on C fluxes from pastures in subtropical and tropical regions and on the environment is uncertain, although these systems account for a substantial portion of global C storage. We investigated how cattle grazing influences net ecosystem CO2 and CH4 exchange in subtropical pastures using the eddy covariance technique. Measurements were made over several wet-dry seasonal cycles in a grazed pasture, and in an adjacent pasture during the first three years of grazer exclusion. Grazing increased soil wetness but did not affect soil temperature. By removing aboveground biomass, grazing decreased ecosystem respiration (Reco) and gross primary productivity (GPP). As the decrease in Reco was larger than the reduction in GPP, grazing consistently increased the net CO2 sink strength of subtropical pastures (55, 219 and 187 more C/m2 in 2013, 2014, and 2015). Enteric ruminant fermentation and increased soil wetness due to grazers, increased total net ecosystem CH4 emissions in grazed relative to ungrazed pasture (27-80%). Unlike temperate, arid, and semiarid pastures, where differences in CH4 emissions between grazed and ungrazed pastures are mainly driven by enteric ruminant fermentation, our results showed that the effect of grazing on soil CH4 emissions can be greater than CH4 produced by cattle. Thus, our results suggest that the interactions between grazers and soil hydrology affecting soil CH4 emissions play an important role in determining the environmental impacts of this management practice in a subtropical pasture. Although grazing increased total net ecosystem CH4 emissions and removed aboveground biomass, it increased the net storage of C and decreased the global warming potential associated with C fluxes of pasture by increasing its net CO2 sink strength.

AB - The impact of grazing on C fluxes from pastures in subtropical and tropical regions and on the environment is uncertain, although these systems account for a substantial portion of global C storage. We investigated how cattle grazing influences net ecosystem CO2 and CH4 exchange in subtropical pastures using the eddy covariance technique. Measurements were made over several wet-dry seasonal cycles in a grazed pasture, and in an adjacent pasture during the first three years of grazer exclusion. Grazing increased soil wetness but did not affect soil temperature. By removing aboveground biomass, grazing decreased ecosystem respiration (Reco) and gross primary productivity (GPP). As the decrease in Reco was larger than the reduction in GPP, grazing consistently increased the net CO2 sink strength of subtropical pastures (55, 219 and 187 more C/m2 in 2013, 2014, and 2015). Enteric ruminant fermentation and increased soil wetness due to grazers, increased total net ecosystem CH4 emissions in grazed relative to ungrazed pasture (27-80%). Unlike temperate, arid, and semiarid pastures, where differences in CH4 emissions between grazed and ungrazed pastures are mainly driven by enteric ruminant fermentation, our results showed that the effect of grazing on soil CH4 emissions can be greater than CH4 produced by cattle. Thus, our results suggest that the interactions between grazers and soil hydrology affecting soil CH4 emissions play an important role in determining the environmental impacts of this management practice in a subtropical pasture. Although grazing increased total net ecosystem CH4 emissions and removed aboveground biomass, it increased the net storage of C and decreased the global warming potential associated with C fluxes of pasture by increasing its net CO2 sink strength.

KW - CH

KW - cattle

KW - flooded land

KW - grassland

KW - methane

KW - net ecosystem CO exchange

KW - net ecosystem productivity

KW - pasture

KW - subtropical

KW - tropical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042700630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042700630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eap.1670

DO - 10.1002/eap.1670

M3 - Article

C2 - 29280238

AN - SCOPUS:85042700630

VL - 28

SP - 557

EP - 572

JO - Ecological Appplications

JF - Ecological Appplications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 2

ER -