Governing post apartheid spatiality: Implementing city improvement districts in Cape Town

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To achieve a world-class city capable of attracting business in a competitive global market, the municipal government of Cape Town, South Africa, like many cities of the global North, has adopted a model of urban revitalization popularized by New York City: business or city improvement districts (BIDs or CIDs). By examining CIDs in city center Cape Town, the paper casts light on the socio-spatial relationship facilitating the neoliberal post-apartheid regime and its governance. Analyzing discursive and spatial practices of Cape Town Partnership, the managing body of downtown CIDs, from 2000 to 2006, the paper reveals its difficulties in stabilizing the socio-spatial relations of a transnationalizing urban revitalization strategy and rejects the view of CIDS as simply a global roll-out of neoliberal urban policies. It highlights how CIDs are challenged from both within and outside of their managing structures by contentious local issues, and in particular by vast social inequalities and citizens' historical struggle for inclusive citizenship and the right to the city. Whether and how CIDs' inherent limitations can be overcome to address socio-spatial inequalities is an open question. 2007 The Author Journal compilation

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)602-626
Number of pages25
JournalAntipode
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007

Fingerprint

apartheid
town
district
city center
social inequality
citizenship
regime
governance
urban policy
citizen
market
city

Keywords

  • CapeTown
  • Improvement districts
  • Neoliberal governance
  • Post-apartheid city
  • South Africa
  • Urban revitalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Governing post apartheid spatiality : Implementing city improvement districts in Cape Town. / Miraftab, Faranak.

In: Antipode, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.09.2007, p. 602-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ebe78490185b4a53aa7f6161190ab472,
title = "Governing post apartheid spatiality: Implementing city improvement districts in Cape Town",
abstract = "To achieve a world-class city capable of attracting business in a competitive global market, the municipal government of Cape Town, South Africa, like many cities of the global North, has adopted a model of urban revitalization popularized by New York City: business or city improvement districts (BIDs or CIDs). By examining CIDs in city center Cape Town, the paper casts light on the socio-spatial relationship facilitating the neoliberal post-apartheid regime and its governance. Analyzing discursive and spatial practices of Cape Town Partnership, the managing body of downtown CIDs, from 2000 to 2006, the paper reveals its difficulties in stabilizing the socio-spatial relations of a transnationalizing urban revitalization strategy and rejects the view of CIDS as simply a global roll-out of neoliberal urban policies. It highlights how CIDs are challenged from both within and outside of their managing structures by contentious local issues, and in particular by vast social inequalities and citizens' historical struggle for inclusive citizenship and the right to the city. Whether and how CIDs' inherent limitations can be overcome to address socio-spatial inequalities is an open question. 2007 The Author Journal compilation",
keywords = "CapeTown, Improvement districts, Neoliberal governance, Post-apartheid city, South Africa, Urban revitalization",
author = "Faranak Miraftab",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00543.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "602--626",
journal = "Antipode",
issn = "0066-4812",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing post apartheid spatiality

T2 - Implementing city improvement districts in Cape Town

AU - Miraftab, Faranak

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - To achieve a world-class city capable of attracting business in a competitive global market, the municipal government of Cape Town, South Africa, like many cities of the global North, has adopted a model of urban revitalization popularized by New York City: business or city improvement districts (BIDs or CIDs). By examining CIDs in city center Cape Town, the paper casts light on the socio-spatial relationship facilitating the neoliberal post-apartheid regime and its governance. Analyzing discursive and spatial practices of Cape Town Partnership, the managing body of downtown CIDs, from 2000 to 2006, the paper reveals its difficulties in stabilizing the socio-spatial relations of a transnationalizing urban revitalization strategy and rejects the view of CIDS as simply a global roll-out of neoliberal urban policies. It highlights how CIDs are challenged from both within and outside of their managing structures by contentious local issues, and in particular by vast social inequalities and citizens' historical struggle for inclusive citizenship and the right to the city. Whether and how CIDs' inherent limitations can be overcome to address socio-spatial inequalities is an open question. 2007 The Author Journal compilation

AB - To achieve a world-class city capable of attracting business in a competitive global market, the municipal government of Cape Town, South Africa, like many cities of the global North, has adopted a model of urban revitalization popularized by New York City: business or city improvement districts (BIDs or CIDs). By examining CIDs in city center Cape Town, the paper casts light on the socio-spatial relationship facilitating the neoliberal post-apartheid regime and its governance. Analyzing discursive and spatial practices of Cape Town Partnership, the managing body of downtown CIDs, from 2000 to 2006, the paper reveals its difficulties in stabilizing the socio-spatial relations of a transnationalizing urban revitalization strategy and rejects the view of CIDS as simply a global roll-out of neoliberal urban policies. It highlights how CIDs are challenged from both within and outside of their managing structures by contentious local issues, and in particular by vast social inequalities and citizens' historical struggle for inclusive citizenship and the right to the city. Whether and how CIDs' inherent limitations can be overcome to address socio-spatial inequalities is an open question. 2007 The Author Journal compilation

KW - CapeTown

KW - Improvement districts

KW - Neoliberal governance

KW - Post-apartheid city

KW - South Africa

KW - Urban revitalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548792906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548792906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00543.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00543.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548792906

VL - 39

SP - 602

EP - 626

JO - Antipode

JF - Antipode

SN - 0066-4812

IS - 4

ER -