TY - JOUR
T1 - Gone today but here tomorrow
T2 - Extending the unfolding model of turnover to consider boomerang employees
AU - Shipp, Abbie J.
AU - Furst-Holloway, Stacie
AU - Harris, T. Brad
AU - Rosen, Benson
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Turnover research typically views voluntary turnover as an end state that severs the employment relationship permanently. However, this perspective overlooks the possibility that an employee who quits may return in the future. Anecdotal and empirical evidence suggest that these "Boomerangs" can be a valuable staffing resource for their organizations. Yet, research regarding this type of employee is largely absent. Thus, we know little about whether the experiences of these temporary leavers differ from those who leave an organization permanently. In this paper, we examined differences between Boomerangs (employees who quit but are later rehired) and "Alumni" (employees who quit but will not return) using both qualitative and quantitative data. In a large sample of professional service employees, we found that Boomerangs and Alumni reported different reasons for having quit, which meant they were more likely to be classified on different paths in the unfolding model of turnover. In addition, survival analyses on the time to turnover suggest that Boomerangs quit earlier than Alumni in their original tenure, paradoxically suggesting that employees who quit earlier may be the very employees who will return in the future. Together, our findings suggest an extension to the unfolding model that considers how the timing of and reasons for turnover impact post-turnover (return) decisions.
AB - Turnover research typically views voluntary turnover as an end state that severs the employment relationship permanently. However, this perspective overlooks the possibility that an employee who quits may return in the future. Anecdotal and empirical evidence suggest that these "Boomerangs" can be a valuable staffing resource for their organizations. Yet, research regarding this type of employee is largely absent. Thus, we know little about whether the experiences of these temporary leavers differ from those who leave an organization permanently. In this paper, we examined differences between Boomerangs (employees who quit but are later rehired) and "Alumni" (employees who quit but will not return) using both qualitative and quantitative data. In a large sample of professional service employees, we found that Boomerangs and Alumni reported different reasons for having quit, which meant they were more likely to be classified on different paths in the unfolding model of turnover. In addition, survival analyses on the time to turnover suggest that Boomerangs quit earlier than Alumni in their original tenure, paradoxically suggesting that employees who quit earlier may be the very employees who will return in the future. Together, our findings suggest an extension to the unfolding model that considers how the timing of and reasons for turnover impact post-turnover (return) decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898837526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898837526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/peps.12039
DO - 10.1111/peps.12039
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84898837526
SN - 0031-5826
VL - 67
SP - 421
EP - 462
JO - Personnel Psychology
JF - Personnel Psychology
IS - 2
ER -