Abstract
This essay seeks to provide further critique and clarity to the peer review process and the ways in which management of peer review is evolving. These changes occur within a context of massive growth in the knowledge production process: global trends, information technologies, and policies that encourage more people globally to take part in the research pro-cess. Associated with these global changes are stressors on the peer review process and particularly questions about who gets to be a peer reviewer and who has the right to produce knowledge under these processes. Less a formal review and analysis of peer review across LIS, this essay takes the form of an autoethnograpic narrative that that seeks to draw upon the researcher’s personal observations, experience, and reflections to critically examine changes to the peer review system that are taking place.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | JLIS.it |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Information Society
- Library and Information Science
- Peer Rewiew Ethics
- Publication Ethics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Conservation
- Computer Science Applications
- Library and Information Sciences