Global service-learning in institutions of higher education: concerns from a community of practice

Benjamin James Lough, Cynthia Toms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In order to better understand and determine priorities of global service-learning in higher education, this study used an empowering evaluation processes to assess the strategic trajectories needed for growth in this field. Researchers organised 36 focus groups during an international summit to map the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for global service-learning in higher education. These focus groups generated 121 summary statements, which were qualitatively coded and analysed to assess common themes. Participants identified six main needs that could strengthen the practice of global service-learning. These needs highlight common priorities and current dilemmas faced by the emerging field of global service-learning, and illustrate the priorities needed to move this field forward in the coming years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-77
Number of pages12
JournalGlobalisation, Societies and Education
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

learning
community
education
Group
evaluation

Keywords

  • Global
  • community partnership
  • engagement
  • qualitative
  • service-learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Global service-learning in institutions of higher education : concerns from a community of practice. / Lough, Benjamin James; Toms, Cynthia.

In: Globalisation, Societies and Education, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 66-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e4b9f59dd634332a746ef7429e1d4f8,
title = "Global service-learning in institutions of higher education: concerns from a community of practice",
abstract = "In order to better understand and determine priorities of global service-learning in higher education, this study used an empowering evaluation processes to assess the strategic trajectories needed for growth in this field. Researchers organised 36 focus groups during an international summit to map the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for global service-learning in higher education. These focus groups generated 121 summary statements, which were qualitatively coded and analysed to assess common themes. Participants identified six main needs that could strengthen the practice of global service-learning. These needs highlight common priorities and current dilemmas faced by the emerging field of global service-learning, and illustrate the priorities needed to move this field forward in the coming years.",
keywords = "Global, community partnership, engagement, qualitative, service-learning",
author = "Lough, {Benjamin James} and Cynthia Toms",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14767724.2017.1356705",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "66--77",
journal = "Globalisation, Societies and Education",
issn = "1476-7724",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global service-learning in institutions of higher education

T2 - concerns from a community of practice

AU - Lough, Benjamin James

AU - Toms, Cynthia

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In order to better understand and determine priorities of global service-learning in higher education, this study used an empowering evaluation processes to assess the strategic trajectories needed for growth in this field. Researchers organised 36 focus groups during an international summit to map the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for global service-learning in higher education. These focus groups generated 121 summary statements, which were qualitatively coded and analysed to assess common themes. Participants identified six main needs that could strengthen the practice of global service-learning. These needs highlight common priorities and current dilemmas faced by the emerging field of global service-learning, and illustrate the priorities needed to move this field forward in the coming years.

AB - In order to better understand and determine priorities of global service-learning in higher education, this study used an empowering evaluation processes to assess the strategic trajectories needed for growth in this field. Researchers organised 36 focus groups during an international summit to map the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for global service-learning in higher education. These focus groups generated 121 summary statements, which were qualitatively coded and analysed to assess common themes. Participants identified six main needs that could strengthen the practice of global service-learning. These needs highlight common priorities and current dilemmas faced by the emerging field of global service-learning, and illustrate the priorities needed to move this field forward in the coming years.

KW - Global

KW - community partnership

KW - engagement

KW - qualitative

KW - service-learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025840707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025840707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14767724.2017.1356705

DO - 10.1080/14767724.2017.1356705

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85025840707

VL - 16

SP - 66

EP - 77

JO - Globalisation, Societies and Education

JF - Globalisation, Societies and Education

SN - 1476-7724

IS - 1

ER -