Genetic gain from phenotypic and genomic selection for quantitative resistance to stem rust of wheat

J. Rutkoski, R. P. Singh, J. Huerta-Espino, S. Bhavani, J. Poland, J. L. Jannink, M. E. Sorrells

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Stem rust of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici Eriks. and E. Henn. is a globally important disease that can cause severe yield loss. Breeding for quantitative stem rust resistance (QSRR) is important for developing cultivars with durable resistance. Genomic selection (GS) could increase rates of genetic gain for quantitative traits, but few experiments comparing GS and phenotypic selection (PS) have been conducted. Our objectives were to (i) compare realized gain from GS based on markers only with that of PS for QSRR in spring wheat using equal selection intensities; (ii) determine if gains agree with theoretical expectations; and (iii) compare the impact of GS and PS on inbreeding, genetic variance, and correlated response for pseudo-black chaff (PBC), a correlated trait. Over 2 yr, two cycles of GS were performed in parallel with one cycle of PS, with each method replicated twice. For GS, markers were generated using genotyping-by-sequencing, the prediction model was initially trained using historical data, and the model was updated before the second GS cycle. Overall, GS and PS led to a 31 ± 11 and 42 ± 12% increase in QSRR and a 138 ± 22 and 180 ± 70% increase in PBC, respectively. Genetic gains were not significant but were in agreement with expectations. Per year, gains from GS and PS were equal, but GS led to significantly lower genetic variance. This shows that while GS and PS can lead to equal rates of short-term gains, GS can reduce genetic variance more rapidly. Further work to develop efficient GS implementation strategies in spring wheat is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPlant Genome
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stem rust
marker-assisted selection
genetic improvement
Triticum
wheat
Inbreeding
genetic variance
Breeding
chaff
spring wheat
Puccinia graminis
selection intensity
correlated responses
quantitative traits
inbreeding
genotyping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Genetic gain from phenotypic and genomic selection for quantitative resistance to stem rust of wheat. / Rutkoski, J.; Singh, R. P.; Huerta-Espino, J.; Bhavani, S.; Poland, J.; Jannink, J. L.; Sorrells, M. E.

In: Plant Genome, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rutkoski, J. ; Singh, R. P. ; Huerta-Espino, J. ; Bhavani, S. ; Poland, J. ; Jannink, J. L. ; Sorrells, M. E. / Genetic gain from phenotypic and genomic selection for quantitative resistance to stem rust of wheat. In: Plant Genome. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 2.
@article{c6c4b90b55674c1b816210a82b7032ac,
title = "Genetic gain from phenotypic and genomic selection for quantitative resistance to stem rust of wheat",
abstract = "Stem rust of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici Eriks. and E. Henn. is a globally important disease that can cause severe yield loss. Breeding for quantitative stem rust resistance (QSRR) is important for developing cultivars with durable resistance. Genomic selection (GS) could increase rates of genetic gain for quantitative traits, but few experiments comparing GS and phenotypic selection (PS) have been conducted. Our objectives were to (i) compare realized gain from GS based on markers only with that of PS for QSRR in spring wheat using equal selection intensities; (ii) determine if gains agree with theoretical expectations; and (iii) compare the impact of GS and PS on inbreeding, genetic variance, and correlated response for pseudo-black chaff (PBC), a correlated trait. Over 2 yr, two cycles of GS were performed in parallel with one cycle of PS, with each method replicated twice. For GS, markers were generated using genotyping-by-sequencing, the prediction model was initially trained using historical data, and the model was updated before the second GS cycle. Overall, GS and PS led to a 31 ± 11 and 42 ± 12{\%} increase in QSRR and a 138 ± 22 and 180 ± 70{\%} increase in PBC, respectively. Genetic gains were not significant but were in agreement with expectations. Per year, gains from GS and PS were equal, but GS led to significantly lower genetic variance. This shows that while GS and PS can lead to equal rates of short-term gains, GS can reduce genetic variance more rapidly. Further work to develop efficient GS implementation strategies in spring wheat is warranted.",
author = "J. Rutkoski and Singh, {R. P.} and J. Huerta-Espino and S. Bhavani and J. Poland and Jannink, {J. L.} and Sorrells, {M. E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0074",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Plant Genome",
issn = "1940-3372",
publisher = "Crop Science Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic gain from phenotypic and genomic selection for quantitative resistance to stem rust of wheat

AU - Rutkoski, J.

AU - Singh, R. P.

AU - Huerta-Espino, J.

AU - Bhavani, S.

AU - Poland, J.

AU - Jannink, J. L.

AU - Sorrells, M. E.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Stem rust of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici Eriks. and E. Henn. is a globally important disease that can cause severe yield loss. Breeding for quantitative stem rust resistance (QSRR) is important for developing cultivars with durable resistance. Genomic selection (GS) could increase rates of genetic gain for quantitative traits, but few experiments comparing GS and phenotypic selection (PS) have been conducted. Our objectives were to (i) compare realized gain from GS based on markers only with that of PS for QSRR in spring wheat using equal selection intensities; (ii) determine if gains agree with theoretical expectations; and (iii) compare the impact of GS and PS on inbreeding, genetic variance, and correlated response for pseudo-black chaff (PBC), a correlated trait. Over 2 yr, two cycles of GS were performed in parallel with one cycle of PS, with each method replicated twice. For GS, markers were generated using genotyping-by-sequencing, the prediction model was initially trained using historical data, and the model was updated before the second GS cycle. Overall, GS and PS led to a 31 ± 11 and 42 ± 12% increase in QSRR and a 138 ± 22 and 180 ± 70% increase in PBC, respectively. Genetic gains were not significant but were in agreement with expectations. Per year, gains from GS and PS were equal, but GS led to significantly lower genetic variance. This shows that while GS and PS can lead to equal rates of short-term gains, GS can reduce genetic variance more rapidly. Further work to develop efficient GS implementation strategies in spring wheat is warranted.

AB - Stem rust of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici Eriks. and E. Henn. is a globally important disease that can cause severe yield loss. Breeding for quantitative stem rust resistance (QSRR) is important for developing cultivars with durable resistance. Genomic selection (GS) could increase rates of genetic gain for quantitative traits, but few experiments comparing GS and phenotypic selection (PS) have been conducted. Our objectives were to (i) compare realized gain from GS based on markers only with that of PS for QSRR in spring wheat using equal selection intensities; (ii) determine if gains agree with theoretical expectations; and (iii) compare the impact of GS and PS on inbreeding, genetic variance, and correlated response for pseudo-black chaff (PBC), a correlated trait. Over 2 yr, two cycles of GS were performed in parallel with one cycle of PS, with each method replicated twice. For GS, markers were generated using genotyping-by-sequencing, the prediction model was initially trained using historical data, and the model was updated before the second GS cycle. Overall, GS and PS led to a 31 ± 11 and 42 ± 12% increase in QSRR and a 138 ± 22 and 180 ± 70% increase in PBC, respectively. Genetic gains were not significant but were in agreement with expectations. Per year, gains from GS and PS were equal, but GS led to significantly lower genetic variance. This shows that while GS and PS can lead to equal rates of short-term gains, GS can reduce genetic variance more rapidly. Further work to develop efficient GS implementation strategies in spring wheat is warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937010785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937010785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0074

DO - 10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0074

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937010785

VL - 8

JO - Plant Genome

JF - Plant Genome

SN - 1940-3372

IS - 2

ER -