Abstract
This study examined gender differences in Holland's occupational interest types and occupational prestige for persons in a science, math, or technical (SMT) career. Participants were 113 (62 female, 51 male) young adults followed up in 1990 from a larger Midwest longitudinal study involving six high schools first assessed in 1980. Their 1990 occupations (n= 71) or college majors (n= 42) were coded for Holland occupational interest type and prestige. As expected, gender differences were found for occupational prestige (p< .001). The odds for the men compared to women being in higher prestige majors/occupations were 18.7 times higher. Men and women had similar proportions of occupations with a Holland Investigative emphasis. Although, as in previous research, there were gender differences (p< .01) for Holland's Realistic and Social interest types this was true only when Realistic or Social was the first letter in the Holland code. There were no gender differences for Holland Realistic or Social codes in the second or third positions. Our findings indicate that women need not feel they must give up their Social interests to pursue a high-prestige science career since many of these combine Social with Investigative and Realistic interests. Results are discussed with implications for practice and future research.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 73-96 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Vocational Behavior |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 1998 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Applied Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Life-span and Life-course Studies
Cite this
Gender Differences in Science, Math, and Technology Careers : Prestige Level and Holland Interest Type. / Farmer, Helen; Rotella, Susanne; Anderson, Carolyn Jane; Wardrop, James.
In: Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.08.1998, p. 73-96.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender Differences in Science, Math, and Technology Careers
T2 - Prestige Level and Holland Interest Type
AU - Farmer, Helen
AU - Rotella, Susanne
AU - Anderson, Carolyn Jane
AU - Wardrop, James
PY - 1998/8/1
Y1 - 1998/8/1
N2 - This study examined gender differences in Holland's occupational interest types and occupational prestige for persons in a science, math, or technical (SMT) career. Participants were 113 (62 female, 51 male) young adults followed up in 1990 from a larger Midwest longitudinal study involving six high schools first assessed in 1980. Their 1990 occupations (n= 71) or college majors (n= 42) were coded for Holland occupational interest type and prestige. As expected, gender differences were found for occupational prestige (p< .001). The odds for the men compared to women being in higher prestige majors/occupations were 18.7 times higher. Men and women had similar proportions of occupations with a Holland Investigative emphasis. Although, as in previous research, there were gender differences (p< .01) for Holland's Realistic and Social interest types this was true only when Realistic or Social was the first letter in the Holland code. There were no gender differences for Holland Realistic or Social codes in the second or third positions. Our findings indicate that women need not feel they must give up their Social interests to pursue a high-prestige science career since many of these combine Social with Investigative and Realistic interests. Results are discussed with implications for practice and future research.
AB - This study examined gender differences in Holland's occupational interest types and occupational prestige for persons in a science, math, or technical (SMT) career. Participants were 113 (62 female, 51 male) young adults followed up in 1990 from a larger Midwest longitudinal study involving six high schools first assessed in 1980. Their 1990 occupations (n= 71) or college majors (n= 42) were coded for Holland occupational interest type and prestige. As expected, gender differences were found for occupational prestige (p< .001). The odds for the men compared to women being in higher prestige majors/occupations were 18.7 times higher. Men and women had similar proportions of occupations with a Holland Investigative emphasis. Although, as in previous research, there were gender differences (p< .01) for Holland's Realistic and Social interest types this was true only when Realistic or Social was the first letter in the Holland code. There were no gender differences for Holland Realistic or Social codes in the second or third positions. Our findings indicate that women need not feel they must give up their Social interests to pursue a high-prestige science career since many of these combine Social with Investigative and Realistic interests. Results are discussed with implications for practice and future research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040944359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040944359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1608
DO - 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1608
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0040944359
VL - 53
SP - 73
EP - 96
JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior
JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior
SN - 0001-8791
IS - 1
ER -