Gender Differences in Science, Math, and Technology Careers: Prestige Level and Holland Interest Type

Helen Farmer, Susanne Rotella, Carolyn Jane Anderson, James Wardrop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined gender differences in Holland's occupational interest types and occupational prestige for persons in a science, math, or technical (SMT) career. Participants were 113 (62 female, 51 male) young adults followed up in 1990 from a larger Midwest longitudinal study involving six high schools first assessed in 1980. Their 1990 occupations (n= 71) or college majors (n= 42) were coded for Holland occupational interest type and prestige. As expected, gender differences were found for occupational prestige (p< .001). The odds for the men compared to women being in higher prestige majors/occupations were 18.7 times higher. Men and women had similar proportions of occupations with a Holland Investigative emphasis. Although, as in previous research, there were gender differences (p< .01) for Holland's Realistic and Social interest types this was true only when Realistic or Social was the first letter in the Holland code. There were no gender differences for Holland Realistic or Social codes in the second or third positions. Our findings indicate that women need not feel they must give up their Social interests to pursue a high-prestige science career since many of these combine Social with Investigative and Realistic interests. Results are discussed with implications for practice and future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-96
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Vocational Behavior
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1998

Fingerprint

prestige
Occupations
Netherlands
gender-specific factors
career
occupational prestige
Technology
occupation
science
social code
Longitudinal Studies
Young Adult
young adult
longitudinal study
Research
human being
Prestige
Gender differences
school
Occupational interests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Gender Differences in Science, Math, and Technology Careers : Prestige Level and Holland Interest Type. / Farmer, Helen; Rotella, Susanne; Anderson, Carolyn Jane; Wardrop, James.

In: Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.08.1998, p. 73-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2640c9b58eb7462683bcabe2f5ecd58e,
title = "Gender Differences in Science, Math, and Technology Careers: Prestige Level and Holland Interest Type",
abstract = "This study examined gender differences in Holland's occupational interest types and occupational prestige for persons in a science, math, or technical (SMT) career. Participants were 113 (62 female, 51 male) young adults followed up in 1990 from a larger Midwest longitudinal study involving six high schools first assessed in 1980. Their 1990 occupations (n= 71) or college majors (n= 42) were coded for Holland occupational interest type and prestige. As expected, gender differences were found for occupational prestige (p< .001). The odds for the men compared to women being in higher prestige majors/occupations were 18.7 times higher. Men and women had similar proportions of occupations with a Holland Investigative emphasis. Although, as in previous research, there were gender differences (p< .01) for Holland's Realistic and Social interest types this was true only when Realistic or Social was the first letter in the Holland code. There were no gender differences for Holland Realistic or Social codes in the second or third positions. Our findings indicate that women need not feel they must give up their Social interests to pursue a high-prestige science career since many of these combine Social with Investigative and Realistic interests. Results are discussed with implications for practice and future research.",
author = "Helen Farmer and Susanne Rotella and Anderson, {Carolyn Jane} and James Wardrop",
year = "1998",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/jvbe.1997.1608",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "73--96",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Behavior",
issn = "0001-8791",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender Differences in Science, Math, and Technology Careers

T2 - Prestige Level and Holland Interest Type

AU - Farmer, Helen

AU - Rotella, Susanne

AU - Anderson, Carolyn Jane

AU - Wardrop, James

PY - 1998/8/1

Y1 - 1998/8/1

N2 - This study examined gender differences in Holland's occupational interest types and occupational prestige for persons in a science, math, or technical (SMT) career. Participants were 113 (62 female, 51 male) young adults followed up in 1990 from a larger Midwest longitudinal study involving six high schools first assessed in 1980. Their 1990 occupations (n= 71) or college majors (n= 42) were coded for Holland occupational interest type and prestige. As expected, gender differences were found for occupational prestige (p< .001). The odds for the men compared to women being in higher prestige majors/occupations were 18.7 times higher. Men and women had similar proportions of occupations with a Holland Investigative emphasis. Although, as in previous research, there were gender differences (p< .01) for Holland's Realistic and Social interest types this was true only when Realistic or Social was the first letter in the Holland code. There were no gender differences for Holland Realistic or Social codes in the second or third positions. Our findings indicate that women need not feel they must give up their Social interests to pursue a high-prestige science career since many of these combine Social with Investigative and Realistic interests. Results are discussed with implications for practice and future research.

AB - This study examined gender differences in Holland's occupational interest types and occupational prestige for persons in a science, math, or technical (SMT) career. Participants were 113 (62 female, 51 male) young adults followed up in 1990 from a larger Midwest longitudinal study involving six high schools first assessed in 1980. Their 1990 occupations (n= 71) or college majors (n= 42) were coded for Holland occupational interest type and prestige. As expected, gender differences were found for occupational prestige (p< .001). The odds for the men compared to women being in higher prestige majors/occupations were 18.7 times higher. Men and women had similar proportions of occupations with a Holland Investigative emphasis. Although, as in previous research, there were gender differences (p< .01) for Holland's Realistic and Social interest types this was true only when Realistic or Social was the first letter in the Holland code. There were no gender differences for Holland Realistic or Social codes in the second or third positions. Our findings indicate that women need not feel they must give up their Social interests to pursue a high-prestige science career since many of these combine Social with Investigative and Realistic interests. Results are discussed with implications for practice and future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040944359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040944359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1608

DO - 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1608

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0040944359

VL - 53

SP - 73

EP - 96

JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior

JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior

SN - 0001-8791

IS - 1

ER -