TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender bias and construct validity in vocational interest measurement
T2 - Differential item functioning in the Strong Interest Inventory
AU - Einarsdóttir, Sif
AU - Rounds, James
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank David A. Donnay and Consulting Psychologist Press for providing the archived data and Daniel Bolt and Terry A. Ackerman for technical assistance. We also thank Patrick I. Armstrong and especially, Christopher A. Moyer for their close reading of an earlier draft of the manuscript. This article is based on a first authors dissertation submitted to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This research was supported in part by a grant from Iceland University of Education.
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - Item response theory was used to address gender bias in interest measurement. Differential item functioning (DIF) technique, SIBTEST and DIMTEST for dimensionality, were applied to the items of the six General Occupational Theme (GOT) and 25 Basic Interest (BI) scales in the Strong Interest Inventory. A sample of 1860 women and 1105 men was used. The scales were not unidimensional and contain both primary and minor dimensions. Gender-related DIF was detected in two-thirds of the items. Item type (i.e., occupations, activities, school subjects, types of people) did not differ in DIF. A sex-type dimension was found to influence the responses of men and women differently. When the biased items were removed from the GOT scales, gender differences favoring men were reduced in the R and I scales but gender differences favoring women remained in the A and S scales. Implications for the development, validation and use of interest measures are discussed.
AB - Item response theory was used to address gender bias in interest measurement. Differential item functioning (DIF) technique, SIBTEST and DIMTEST for dimensionality, were applied to the items of the six General Occupational Theme (GOT) and 25 Basic Interest (BI) scales in the Strong Interest Inventory. A sample of 1860 women and 1105 men was used. The scales were not unidimensional and contain both primary and minor dimensions. Gender-related DIF was detected in two-thirds of the items. Item type (i.e., occupations, activities, school subjects, types of people) did not differ in DIF. A sex-type dimension was found to influence the responses of men and women differently. When the biased items were removed from the GOT scales, gender differences favoring men were reduced in the R and I scales but gender differences favoring women remained in the A and S scales. Implications for the development, validation and use of interest measures are discussed.
KW - Construct validity
KW - Differential item functioning
KW - Gender bias
KW - Gender-fairness
KW - Interest inventories
KW - Interest measurement
KW - Vocational interests
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64049093498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64049093498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:64049093498
SN - 0001-8791
VL - 74
SP - 295
EP - 307
JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior
JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior
IS - 3
ER -