Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration

Nuria Gomez-Casanovas, Kristina Anderson-Teixeira, Marcelo Zeri, Carl J. Bernacchi, Evan H. Delucia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Soil respiration (Rsoil) is one of the largest CO2 fluxes in the global carbon (C) cycle. Estimation of annual Rsoil requires extrapolation of survey measurements or gap filling of automated records to produce a complete time series. Although many gap filling methodologies have been employed, there is no standardized procedure for producing defensible estimates of annual Rsoil. Here, we test the reliability of nine different gap filling techniques by inserting artificial gaps into 20 automated Rsoil records and comparing gap filling Rsoil estimates of each technique to measured values. We show that although the most commonly used techniques do not, on average, produce large systematic biases, gap filling accuracy may be significantly improved through application of the most reliable methods. All methods performed best at lower gap fractions and had relatively high, systematic errors for simulated survey measurements. Overall, the most accurate technique estimated Rsoil based on the soil temperature dependence of Rsoil by assuming constant temperature sensitivity and linearly interpolating reference respiration (Rsoil at 10 °C) across gaps. The linear interpolation method was the second best-performing method. In contrast, estimating Rsoil based on a single annual Rsoil - Tsoil relationship, which is currently the most commonly used technique, was among the most poorly-performing methods. Thus, our analysis demonstrates that gap filling accuracy may be improved substantially without sacrificing computational simplicity. Improved and standardized techniques for estimation of annual Rsoil will be valuable for understanding the role of Rsoil in the global C cycle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1941-1952
Number of pages12
JournalGlobal change biology
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013

Fingerprint

soil respiration
Soils
Systematic errors
soil temperature
interpolation
Extrapolation
respiration
method
Time series
time series
Interpolation
Carbon
methodology
Fluxes
carbon
Temperature
temperature

Keywords

  • Calculation error
  • Carbon cycle
  • Measurement
  • Temporal extrapolation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration. / Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria; Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina; Zeri, Marcelo; Bernacchi, Carl J.; Delucia, Evan H.

In: Global change biology, Vol. 19, No. 6, 01.06.2013, p. 1941-1952.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria ; Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina ; Zeri, Marcelo ; Bernacchi, Carl J. ; Delucia, Evan H. / Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration. In: Global change biology. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 1941-1952.
@article{c62e2925923041ba8fbf873cd59450cb,
title = "Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration",
abstract = "Soil respiration (Rsoil) is one of the largest CO2 fluxes in the global carbon (C) cycle. Estimation of annual Rsoil requires extrapolation of survey measurements or gap filling of automated records to produce a complete time series. Although many gap filling methodologies have been employed, there is no standardized procedure for producing defensible estimates of annual Rsoil. Here, we test the reliability of nine different gap filling techniques by inserting artificial gaps into 20 automated Rsoil records and comparing gap filling Rsoil estimates of each technique to measured values. We show that although the most commonly used techniques do not, on average, produce large systematic biases, gap filling accuracy may be significantly improved through application of the most reliable methods. All methods performed best at lower gap fractions and had relatively high, systematic errors for simulated survey measurements. Overall, the most accurate technique estimated Rsoil based on the soil temperature dependence of Rsoil by assuming constant temperature sensitivity and linearly interpolating reference respiration (Rsoil at 10 °C) across gaps. The linear interpolation method was the second best-performing method. In contrast, estimating Rsoil based on a single annual Rsoil - Tsoil relationship, which is currently the most commonly used technique, was among the most poorly-performing methods. Thus, our analysis demonstrates that gap filling accuracy may be improved substantially without sacrificing computational simplicity. Improved and standardized techniques for estimation of annual Rsoil will be valuable for understanding the role of Rsoil in the global C cycle.",
keywords = "Calculation error, Carbon cycle, Measurement, Temporal extrapolation",
author = "Nuria Gomez-Casanovas and Kristina Anderson-Teixeira and Marcelo Zeri and Bernacchi, {Carl J.} and Delucia, {Evan H.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gcb.12127",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1941--1952",
journal = "Global Change Biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration

AU - Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria

AU - Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina

AU - Zeri, Marcelo

AU - Bernacchi, Carl J.

AU - Delucia, Evan H.

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Soil respiration (Rsoil) is one of the largest CO2 fluxes in the global carbon (C) cycle. Estimation of annual Rsoil requires extrapolation of survey measurements or gap filling of automated records to produce a complete time series. Although many gap filling methodologies have been employed, there is no standardized procedure for producing defensible estimates of annual Rsoil. Here, we test the reliability of nine different gap filling techniques by inserting artificial gaps into 20 automated Rsoil records and comparing gap filling Rsoil estimates of each technique to measured values. We show that although the most commonly used techniques do not, on average, produce large systematic biases, gap filling accuracy may be significantly improved through application of the most reliable methods. All methods performed best at lower gap fractions and had relatively high, systematic errors for simulated survey measurements. Overall, the most accurate technique estimated Rsoil based on the soil temperature dependence of Rsoil by assuming constant temperature sensitivity and linearly interpolating reference respiration (Rsoil at 10 °C) across gaps. The linear interpolation method was the second best-performing method. In contrast, estimating Rsoil based on a single annual Rsoil - Tsoil relationship, which is currently the most commonly used technique, was among the most poorly-performing methods. Thus, our analysis demonstrates that gap filling accuracy may be improved substantially without sacrificing computational simplicity. Improved and standardized techniques for estimation of annual Rsoil will be valuable for understanding the role of Rsoil in the global C cycle.

AB - Soil respiration (Rsoil) is one of the largest CO2 fluxes in the global carbon (C) cycle. Estimation of annual Rsoil requires extrapolation of survey measurements or gap filling of automated records to produce a complete time series. Although many gap filling methodologies have been employed, there is no standardized procedure for producing defensible estimates of annual Rsoil. Here, we test the reliability of nine different gap filling techniques by inserting artificial gaps into 20 automated Rsoil records and comparing gap filling Rsoil estimates of each technique to measured values. We show that although the most commonly used techniques do not, on average, produce large systematic biases, gap filling accuracy may be significantly improved through application of the most reliable methods. All methods performed best at lower gap fractions and had relatively high, systematic errors for simulated survey measurements. Overall, the most accurate technique estimated Rsoil based on the soil temperature dependence of Rsoil by assuming constant temperature sensitivity and linearly interpolating reference respiration (Rsoil at 10 °C) across gaps. The linear interpolation method was the second best-performing method. In contrast, estimating Rsoil based on a single annual Rsoil - Tsoil relationship, which is currently the most commonly used technique, was among the most poorly-performing methods. Thus, our analysis demonstrates that gap filling accuracy may be improved substantially without sacrificing computational simplicity. Improved and standardized techniques for estimation of annual Rsoil will be valuable for understanding the role of Rsoil in the global C cycle.

KW - Calculation error

KW - Carbon cycle

KW - Measurement

KW - Temporal extrapolation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877076101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877076101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcb.12127

DO - 10.1111/gcb.12127

M3 - Article

C2 - 23504959

AN - SCOPUS:84877076101

VL - 19

SP - 1941

EP - 1952

JO - Global Change Biology

JF - Global Change Biology

SN - 1354-1013

IS - 6

ER -