Fusing numerical relativity and deep learning to detect higher-order multipole waveforms from eccentric binary black hole mergers

Adam Rebei, E. A. Huerta, Sibo Wang, Sarah Habib, Roland Haas, Daniel Johnson, Daniel George

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We determine the mass ratio, eccentricity and binary inclination angles that maximize the contribution of the higher-order waveform multipoles (ℓ|m|)={(2,2),(2,1),(3,3),(3,2),(3,1),(4,4),(4,3),(4,2),(4,1)} for the gravitational wave detection of eccentric binary black hole mergers. We carry out this study using numerical relativity waveforms that describe nonspinning black hole binaries with mass ratios 1≤q≤10, and orbital eccentricities as high as e0=0.18 fifteen cycles before merger. For stellar-mass, asymmetric mass-ratio, binary black hole mergers, and assuming LIGO's zero detuned high power configuration, we find that in regions of parameter space where black hole mergers modeled with =|m|=2 waveforms have vanishing signal-to-noise ratios, the inclusion of (ℓ|m|) modes enables the observation of these sources with signal-to-noise ratios that range between 30% and 45% of the signal-to-noise ratio of optimally oriented binary black hole mergers modeled with =|m|=2 numerical relativity waveforms. Having determined the parameter space where (ℓ|m|) modes are important for gravitational wave detection, we construct waveform signals that describe these astrophysically motivated scenarios and demonstrate that these topologically complex signals can be detected and characterized in real LIGO noise with deep learning algorithms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number044025
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume100
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 12 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fusing numerical relativity and deep learning to detect higher-order multipole waveforms from eccentric binary black hole mergers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this