TY - JOUR
T1 - Fundamental skills of robotic surgery
T2 - A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum
AU - Stegemann, Andrew P.
AU - Ahmed, Kamran
AU - Syed, Johar R.
AU - Rehman, Shabnam
AU - Ghani, Khurshid
AU - Autorino, Ricardo
AU - Sharif, Mohamed
AU - Rao, Amrith
AU - Shi, Yi
AU - Wilding, Gregory E.
AU - Hassett, James M.
AU - Chowriappa, Ashirwad
AU - Kesavadas, Thenkurussi
AU - Peabody, James O.
AU - Menon, Mani
AU - Kaouk, Jihad
AU - Guru, Khurshid Ahad
N1 - Funding Support : This work was funded by the John R. Oishei Foundation and the Roswell Park Alliance Foundation .
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - Objective: To develop and establish effectiveness of simulation-based robotic curriculum - fundamental skills of robotic surgery (FSRS). Methods: FSRS curriculum was developed and incorporated into a virtual reality simulator, Robotic Surgical Simulator (RoSS). Fifty-three participants were randomized into an experimental group (EG) or control group (CG). The EG was asked to complete the FSRS and 1 final test on the da Vinci Surgical System (dVSS). The dVSS test consisted of 3 tasks: ball placement, suture pass, and fourth arm manipulation. The CG was directly tested on the dVSS then offered the chance to complete the FSRS and re-tested on the dVSS as a crossover (CO) group. Results: Sixty-five percent of participants had never formally trained using laparoscopic surgery. Ball placement: the EG demonstrated shorter time (142 vs 164 seconds, P =.134) and more precise (1.5 vs 2.5 drops, P =.014). The CO took less time (P <.001) with greater precision (P <.001). Instruments were rarely lost from the field. Suture pass: the EG demonstrated better camera utilization (4.3 vs 3.0, P =.078). Less instrument loss occurred (0.5 vs 1.1, P =.026). Proper camera usage significantly improved (P =.009). Fourth arm manipulation: the EG took less time (132 vs 157 seconds, P =.302). Meanwhile, loss of instruments was less frequent (0.2 vs 0.8, P =.076). Precision in the CO improved significantly (P =.042) and camera control and safe instrument manipulation showed improvement (1.5 vs 3.5, 0.2 vs 0.9, respectively). Conclusion: FSRS curriculum is a valid, feasible, and structured curriculum that demonstrates its effectiveness by significant improvements in basic robotic surgery skills.
AB - Objective: To develop and establish effectiveness of simulation-based robotic curriculum - fundamental skills of robotic surgery (FSRS). Methods: FSRS curriculum was developed and incorporated into a virtual reality simulator, Robotic Surgical Simulator (RoSS). Fifty-three participants were randomized into an experimental group (EG) or control group (CG). The EG was asked to complete the FSRS and 1 final test on the da Vinci Surgical System (dVSS). The dVSS test consisted of 3 tasks: ball placement, suture pass, and fourth arm manipulation. The CG was directly tested on the dVSS then offered the chance to complete the FSRS and re-tested on the dVSS as a crossover (CO) group. Results: Sixty-five percent of participants had never formally trained using laparoscopic surgery. Ball placement: the EG demonstrated shorter time (142 vs 164 seconds, P =.134) and more precise (1.5 vs 2.5 drops, P =.014). The CO took less time (P <.001) with greater precision (P <.001). Instruments were rarely lost from the field. Suture pass: the EG demonstrated better camera utilization (4.3 vs 3.0, P =.078). Less instrument loss occurred (0.5 vs 1.1, P =.026). Proper camera usage significantly improved (P =.009). Fourth arm manipulation: the EG took less time (132 vs 157 seconds, P =.302). Meanwhile, loss of instruments was less frequent (0.2 vs 0.8, P =.076). Precision in the CO improved significantly (P =.042) and camera control and safe instrument manipulation showed improvement (1.5 vs 3.5, 0.2 vs 0.9, respectively). Conclusion: FSRS curriculum is a valid, feasible, and structured curriculum that demonstrates its effectiveness by significant improvements in basic robotic surgery skills.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875486571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875486571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.033
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 23484743
AN - SCOPUS:84875486571
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 81
SP - 767
EP - 774
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 4
ER -