TY - JOUR
T1 - Frozen section analysis in the post-Bethesda era
AU - Cotton, Travis M.
AU - Xin, Jing
AU - Sandyhya, John
AU - Lirov, Roy
AU - Miller, Barbara S.
AU - Cohen, Mark S.
AU - Gauger, Paul G.
AU - Hughes, David T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Background The utility of frozen section (FS) for indeterminate thyroid nodules is controversial. In 2009, the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology was established to further subcategorize indeterminate fine-needle aspiration results (follicular lesions, FL) into Bethesda category 3 (BC3) and Bethesda category 4 (BC4). We hypothesize that FS will have less utility in the evaluation of BC3 lesions when compared to BC4. Materials and methods A total of 479 patients who underwent thyroid lobectomy from January 2008 to July 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients without appropriate Bethesda categorization were excluded. A total of 135 patients (65 FL, 45 BC3, 25 BC4) comprised the study groups. The sensitivity and specificity of FS within these three categories were determined. Results In the FL group, 6 of 65 patients were found to have thyroid cancer. Three were identified on frozen section (FS) resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 100%, respectively. Thus, FS changed the operation in 3 of 65 cases (4.6%). In the BC3 group, 5 of 45 patients were found to have cancer. One was identified on FS resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 20% and 100%, respectively. Thus, FS changed the operation in 1 of 45 patients (2.2%). In the BC4 group, 4 of 25 patients were found to have cancer. Two were identified on FS resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 100% respectively. Thus, FS changed the operation in 2 of 25 patients (8%). Conclusions There is improved utility of FS in BC 4 patients as 8% avoided reoperation. However, this benefit hinges on surgeon practice regarding the management of differentiated thyroid cancer >1 cm and <4 cm.
AB - Background The utility of frozen section (FS) for indeterminate thyroid nodules is controversial. In 2009, the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology was established to further subcategorize indeterminate fine-needle aspiration results (follicular lesions, FL) into Bethesda category 3 (BC3) and Bethesda category 4 (BC4). We hypothesize that FS will have less utility in the evaluation of BC3 lesions when compared to BC4. Materials and methods A total of 479 patients who underwent thyroid lobectomy from January 2008 to July 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients without appropriate Bethesda categorization were excluded. A total of 135 patients (65 FL, 45 BC3, 25 BC4) comprised the study groups. The sensitivity and specificity of FS within these three categories were determined. Results In the FL group, 6 of 65 patients were found to have thyroid cancer. Three were identified on frozen section (FS) resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 100%, respectively. Thus, FS changed the operation in 3 of 65 cases (4.6%). In the BC3 group, 5 of 45 patients were found to have cancer. One was identified on FS resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 20% and 100%, respectively. Thus, FS changed the operation in 1 of 45 patients (2.2%). In the BC4 group, 4 of 25 patients were found to have cancer. Two were identified on FS resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 100% respectively. Thus, FS changed the operation in 2 of 25 patients (8%). Conclusions There is improved utility of FS in BC 4 patients as 8% avoided reoperation. However, this benefit hinges on surgeon practice regarding the management of differentiated thyroid cancer >1 cm and <4 cm.
KW - Bethesda System for Reporting thyroid cytopathology
KW - Follicular lesions of undetermined significance
KW - Indeterminate thyroid lesion
KW - Suspicious for follicular neoplasm
KW - Thyroid frozen section
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980335722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980335722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.072
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.072
M3 - Article
C2 - 27664888
AN - SCOPUS:84980335722
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 205
SP - 393
EP - 397
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 2
ER -