From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project

Martin Streibel, Robert J. Finley, Sonja Martens, Sallie E Greenberg, Fabian Möller, Axel Liebscher

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO2 storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO2 storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO2 stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO2 storage in such reservoirs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6323-6334
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume63
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Event12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2014 - Austin, United States
Duration: Oct 5 2014Oct 9 2014

Fingerprint

Temperature

Keywords

  • CO geological storage
  • Demonstration
  • Illinois basin-decatur project
  • Ketzin
  • Monitoring
  • Pilot
  • Saline reservoir
  • Storage operation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)

Cite this

From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project. / Streibel, Martin; Finley, Robert J.; Martens, Sonja; Greenberg, Sallie E; Möller, Fabian; Liebscher, Axel.

In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 63, 01.01.2014, p. 6323-6334.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Streibel, Martin ; Finley, Robert J. ; Martens, Sonja ; Greenberg, Sallie E ; Möller, Fabian ; Liebscher, Axel. / From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project. In: Energy Procedia. 2014 ; Vol. 63. pp. 6323-6334.
@article{aaadb39383fa4d0cae775853de433474,
title = "From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project",
abstract = "The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO2 storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO2 storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO2 stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO2 storage in such reservoirs.",
keywords = "CO geological storage, Demonstration, Illinois basin-decatur project, Ketzin, Monitoring, Pilot, Saline reservoir, Storage operation",
author = "Martin Streibel and Finley, {Robert J.} and Sonja Martens and Greenberg, {Sallie E} and Fabian M{\"o}ller and Axel Liebscher",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "6323--6334",
journal = "Energy Procedia",
issn = "1876-6102",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project

AU - Streibel, Martin

AU - Finley, Robert J.

AU - Martens, Sonja

AU - Greenberg, Sallie E

AU - Möller, Fabian

AU - Liebscher, Axel

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO2 storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO2 storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO2 stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO2 storage in such reservoirs.

AB - The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO2 storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO2 storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO2 stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO2 storage in such reservoirs.

KW - CO geological storage

KW - Demonstration

KW - Illinois basin-decatur project

KW - Ketzin

KW - Monitoring

KW - Pilot

KW - Saline reservoir

KW - Storage operation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922932001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922932001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84922932001

VL - 63

SP - 6323

EP - 6334

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

ER -