From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project

Martin Streibel; Robert J. Finley; Sonja Martens; Sallie Greenberg; Fabian Möller; Axel Liebscher

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665

From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project

Martin Streibel, Robert J. Finley, Sonja Martens, Sallie Greenberg, Fabian Möller, Axel Liebscher

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

Abstract

The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO₂ storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO₂ storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO₂ stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO₂ storage in such reservoirs.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	6323-6334
Number of pages	12
Journal	Energy Procedia
Volume	63
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665
State	Published - 2014
Externally published	Yes
Event	12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2014 - Austin, United States Duration: Oct 5 2014 → Oct 9 2014

Keywords

CO geological storage
Demonstration
Illinois basin-decatur project
Ketzin
Monitoring
Pilot
Saline reservoir
Storage operation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Energy

Online availability

10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665

Library availability

Discover UIUC Full Text

Cite this

@article{aaadb39383fa4d0cae775853de433474,

title = "From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project",

abstract = "The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO2 storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO2 storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO2 stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO2 storage in such reservoirs.",

keywords = "CO geological storage, Demonstration, Illinois basin-decatur project, Ketzin, Monitoring, Pilot, Saline reservoir, Storage operation",

author = "Martin Streibel and Finley, {Robert J.} and Sonja Martens and Sallie Greenberg and Fabian M{\"o}ller and Axel Liebscher",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.; 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2014 ; Conference date: 05-10-2014 Through 09-10-2014",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "63",

pages = "6323--6334",

journal = "Energy Procedia",

issn = "1876-6102",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project

AU - Streibel, Martin

AU - Finley, Robert J.

AU - Martens, Sonja

AU - Greenberg, Sallie

AU - Möller, Fabian

AU - Liebscher, Axel

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO2 storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO2 storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO2 stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO2 storage in such reservoirs.

AB - The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO2 storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO2 storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO2 stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO2 storage in such reservoirs.

KW - CO geological storage

KW - Demonstration

KW - Illinois basin-decatur project

KW - Ketzin

KW - Monitoring

KW - Pilot

KW - Saline reservoir

KW - Storage operation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922932001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922932001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84922932001

SN - 1876-6102

VL - 63

SP - 6323

EP - 6334

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

T2 - 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2014

Y2 - 5 October 2014 through 9 October 2014

ER -

From pilot to demo scale - Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois basin-decatur project

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Online availability

Library availability

Related links

Fingerprint

Cite this