From issues to indicators: Developing robust community sustainability measures

Liam Magee, Andy Scerri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent debate on sustainability indicator development has centred upon top-down and bottom-up methods. In practice, a key difficulty is the establishment of defensible issues and indicators to use. Here, we present a structured approach for transitioning from initial community consultation designed to elicit issues to the downstream definition, composition and measurement of those issues via indicators. The approach incorporates two quantitative techniques from the literature, analytic hierarchy process and Qualitative Sustainability System Index. The application of these techniques is designed to foster a better understanding of the priority of and relationships between issues, prior to the construction of measurement instruments and indicators of sustainability. We develop a prototype implementation of the approach, and elicit feedback from an expert panel on its suitability in a community sustainability context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)915-933
Number of pages19
JournalLocal Environment
Volume17
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • AHP
  • community sustainability
  • indicator development
  • QSSI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From issues to indicators: Developing robust community sustainability measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this