TY - JOUR
T1 - From Depletion to Restoration
T2 - Lessons From Long-Term Monitoring of Carbon Gains and Losses in Cropping Systems
AU - Moore, Caitlin E.
AU - Blakely, Bethany
AU - Pederson, Taylor L.
AU - Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria
AU - Gibson, Christy D.
AU - Knecht, Anya M.
AU - Aslan-Sungur, Guler
AU - DeLucia, Evan H.
AU - Heaton, Emily A.
AU - VanLoocke, Andy
AU - Meyers, Tilden
AU - Bernacchi, Carl J.
N1 - Funding: This work was supported by Biological and Environmental Research (DE-SC0018420) and Agricultural Research Service. Funding for this work was provided by the DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Award Number DE-SC0018420). This work was partially funded by the USDA to the Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit of the USDA Agricultural Research Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the U.S. Department of Energy. The authors thank Mr. Tim Mies and his team for their management of the University of Illinois Energy Farm research facility and the preparation of fields over the lifetime of this work. Additional praise is given to contributions from undergraduates and technicians who helped with data collection over the years. The authors also thank Dr. Peter Isaac and Dr. Cacilia Ewenz from the Australian Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network—An Australian Federal Government NCRIS Facility—for their technical support with PyFluxPro.
Funding for this work was provided by the DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Award Number DE‐SC0018420). This work was partially funded by the USDA to the Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit of the USDA Agricultural Research Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the U.S. Department of Energy. The authors thank Mr. Tim Mies and his team for their management of the University of Illinois Energy Farm research facility and the preparation of fields over the lifetime of this work. Additional praise is given to contributions from undergraduates and technicians who helped with data collection over the years. The authors also thank Dr. Peter Isaac and Dr. Cacilia Ewenz from the Australian Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network—An Australian Federal Government NCRIS Facility—for their technical support with PyFluxPro.
This work was supported by Biological and Environmental Research (DE‐SC0018420) and Agricultural Research Service. Funding:
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - As global atmospheric CO2 rapidly approaches a key tipping point, there is an urgent need to implement strategies to reverse this pattern. A generally accepted understanding of carbon (C) in agricultural fields includes: (H1) substantial C loss occurs when natural vegetation is converted to crops, (H2) soils typically reach a steady-state C concentration under contemporary practices, and (H3) improved management or crop selection can enhance soil C stocks over time. Significant variability exists, but studies consistently show large C losses from agricultural ecosystems, supporting H1. Although steady-state C levels (H2) are commonly assumed, measuring C gains or losses in mature agroecosystems is challenging. Efforts to increase soil C storage (H3) have limited data due to the diversity of potential practices, compounded by substantial variability in soil C measurements. Here, long-term (7–17 year) ecosystem C flux data from diverse cropping systems revealed that conventionally tilled annual row crops (maize and soybean) act as significant long-term atmospheric C sources, challenging H2. Furthermore, conservation tillage practices reduced C losses compared with conventional tillage but showed minimal evidence for long-term ecosystem C storage, even after 20+ years. This indicates that no-till practices reduce C losses but imply that no soil C is added, challenging H3. By contrast, perennial Miscanthus × giganteus, Panicum virgatum, and restored tallgrass prairie systems store C at the ecosystem scale more effectively than minimally tilled annual row crops. Analysis over multiple years demonstrates significant ecosystem C storage with perennial crops, varying by species, starting in the first year of transition. These findings, although focused on one region, suggest that the assumptions of steady-state C levels and increased storage from conservation practices do not universally apply and that significant changes to agroecosystems are required to increase C storage.
AB - As global atmospheric CO2 rapidly approaches a key tipping point, there is an urgent need to implement strategies to reverse this pattern. A generally accepted understanding of carbon (C) in agricultural fields includes: (H1) substantial C loss occurs when natural vegetation is converted to crops, (H2) soils typically reach a steady-state C concentration under contemporary practices, and (H3) improved management or crop selection can enhance soil C stocks over time. Significant variability exists, but studies consistently show large C losses from agricultural ecosystems, supporting H1. Although steady-state C levels (H2) are commonly assumed, measuring C gains or losses in mature agroecosystems is challenging. Efforts to increase soil C storage (H3) have limited data due to the diversity of potential practices, compounded by substantial variability in soil C measurements. Here, long-term (7–17 year) ecosystem C flux data from diverse cropping systems revealed that conventionally tilled annual row crops (maize and soybean) act as significant long-term atmospheric C sources, challenging H2. Furthermore, conservation tillage practices reduced C losses compared with conventional tillage but showed minimal evidence for long-term ecosystem C storage, even after 20+ years. This indicates that no-till practices reduce C losses but imply that no soil C is added, challenging H3. By contrast, perennial Miscanthus × giganteus, Panicum virgatum, and restored tallgrass prairie systems store C at the ecosystem scale more effectively than minimally tilled annual row crops. Analysis over multiple years demonstrates significant ecosystem C storage with perennial crops, varying by species, starting in the first year of transition. These findings, although focused on one region, suggest that the assumptions of steady-state C levels and increased storage from conservation practices do not universally apply and that significant changes to agroecosystems are required to increase C storage.
KW - carbon accounting
KW - carbon farming
KW - carbon sequestration
KW - climate smart agriculture
KW - cropping systems
KW - eddy covariance
KW - greenhouse gas mitigation
KW - soil organic carbon
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007891544
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007891544#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1111/gcb.70291
DO - 10.1111/gcb.70291
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 40485251
AN - SCOPUS:105007891544
SN - 1354-1013
VL - 31
JO - Global change biology
JF - Global change biology
IS - 6
M1 - e70291
ER -