Frivolous Cases

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The problem of frivolous cases is invoked in a variety of contexts. Although the term is used in the context of Rule 11, it is also used to justify many procedural and substantive changes to the law. For example, concern about frivolous cases is invoked to defend the use of procedural devices that limit litigants' access to courts, including summary judgment, motions to dismiss, heightened pleading, and caps, as well as to justify the narrowing of rights in substantive areas such as prisoner's cases and employment discrimination cases. This symposium essay argues for a different view of frivolous cases - a view that eschews the use of the term and instead proposes a new discussion of the relationship of cost to other rights, including the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number13
Pages (from-to)633-648
Number of pages16
JournalDepaul Law Review
Volume59
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Prisoners
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Discrimination (Psychology)

Cite this

Thomas, S. A. (2010). Frivolous Cases. Depaul Law Review, 59(2), 633-648. [13].

Frivolous Cases. / Thomas, Suja A.

In: Depaul Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, 13, 2010, p. 633-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thomas, SA 2010, 'Frivolous Cases', Depaul Law Review, vol. 59, no. 2, 13, pp. 633-648.
Thomas SA. Frivolous Cases. Depaul Law Review. 2010;59(2):633-648. 13.
Thomas, Suja A. / Frivolous Cases. In: Depaul Law Review. 2010 ; Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 633-648.
@article{5428f27760024093b891ff93a307ecf2,
title = "Frivolous Cases",
abstract = "The problem of frivolous cases is invoked in a variety of contexts. Although the term is used in the context of Rule 11, it is also used to justify many procedural and substantive changes to the law. For example, concern about frivolous cases is invoked to defend the use of procedural devices that limit litigants' access to courts, including summary judgment, motions to dismiss, heightened pleading, and caps, as well as to justify the narrowing of rights in substantive areas such as prisoner's cases and employment discrimination cases. This symposium essay argues for a different view of frivolous cases - a view that eschews the use of the term and instead proposes a new discussion of the relationship of cost to other rights, including the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.",
author = "Thomas, {Suja A}",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "633--648",
journal = "De Paul law review",
issn = "0011-7188",
publisher = "De Paul University School of Law",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frivolous Cases

AU - Thomas, Suja A

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The problem of frivolous cases is invoked in a variety of contexts. Although the term is used in the context of Rule 11, it is also used to justify many procedural and substantive changes to the law. For example, concern about frivolous cases is invoked to defend the use of procedural devices that limit litigants' access to courts, including summary judgment, motions to dismiss, heightened pleading, and caps, as well as to justify the narrowing of rights in substantive areas such as prisoner's cases and employment discrimination cases. This symposium essay argues for a different view of frivolous cases - a view that eschews the use of the term and instead proposes a new discussion of the relationship of cost to other rights, including the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.

AB - The problem of frivolous cases is invoked in a variety of contexts. Although the term is used in the context of Rule 11, it is also used to justify many procedural and substantive changes to the law. For example, concern about frivolous cases is invoked to defend the use of procedural devices that limit litigants' access to courts, including summary judgment, motions to dismiss, heightened pleading, and caps, as well as to justify the narrowing of rights in substantive areas such as prisoner's cases and employment discrimination cases. This symposium essay argues for a different view of frivolous cases - a view that eschews the use of the term and instead proposes a new discussion of the relationship of cost to other rights, including the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 633

EP - 648

JO - De Paul law review

JF - De Paul law review

SN - 0011-7188

IS - 2

M1 - 13

ER -