Free-energy cost for translocon-assisted insertion of membrane proteins

James Gumbart, Christophe Chipot, Klaus Schulten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Nascent membrane proteins typically insert in a sequential fashion into the membrane via a protein-conducting channel, the Sec translocon. How this process occurs is still unclear, although a thermodynamic partitioning between the channel and the membrane environment has been proposed. Experiment- and simulation-based scales for the insertion free energy of various amino acids are, however, at variance, the former appearing to lie in a narrower range than the latter. Membrane insertion of arginine, for instance, requires 14-17 kcal?mol according to molecular dynamics simulations, but only 2-3 kcal?mol according to experiment. We suggest that this disagreement is resolved by assuming a two-stage insertion process wherein the first step, the insertion into the translocon, is energized by protein synthesis and, therefore, has an effectively zero free-energy cost; the second step, the insertion into the membrane, invokes the translocon as an intermediary between the fully hydrated and the fully inserted locations. Using free-energy perturbation calculations, the effective transfer free energies from the translocon to the membrane have been determined for both arginine and leucine amino acids carried by a background polyleucine helix. Indeed, the insertion penalty for arginine as well as the insertion gain for leucine from the translocon to the membrane is found to be significantly reduced compared to direct insertion from water, resulting in the same compression as observed in the experiment-based scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3596-3601
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume108
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Membrane Proteins
Costs and Cost Analysis
Membranes
Arginine
Leucine
Amino Acids
Energy Transfer
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Ion Channels
Thermodynamics
Proteins
Water

Keywords

  • Hydrophobicity scale
  • Membrane-protein insertion
  • Ribosome
  • SecY

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Free-energy cost for translocon-assisted insertion of membrane proteins. / Gumbart, James; Chipot, Christophe; Schulten, Klaus.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 108, No. 9, 01.03.2011, p. 3596-3601.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gumbart, James ; Chipot, Christophe ; Schulten, Klaus. / Free-energy cost for translocon-assisted insertion of membrane proteins. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011 ; Vol. 108, No. 9. pp. 3596-3601.
@article{876b4a1b30874a21a0f507fea5890a75,
title = "Free-energy cost for translocon-assisted insertion of membrane proteins",
abstract = "Nascent membrane proteins typically insert in a sequential fashion into the membrane via a protein-conducting channel, the Sec translocon. How this process occurs is still unclear, although a thermodynamic partitioning between the channel and the membrane environment has been proposed. Experiment- and simulation-based scales for the insertion free energy of various amino acids are, however, at variance, the former appearing to lie in a narrower range than the latter. Membrane insertion of arginine, for instance, requires 14-17 kcal?mol according to molecular dynamics simulations, but only 2-3 kcal?mol according to experiment. We suggest that this disagreement is resolved by assuming a two-stage insertion process wherein the first step, the insertion into the translocon, is energized by protein synthesis and, therefore, has an effectively zero free-energy cost; the second step, the insertion into the membrane, invokes the translocon as an intermediary between the fully hydrated and the fully inserted locations. Using free-energy perturbation calculations, the effective transfer free energies from the translocon to the membrane have been determined for both arginine and leucine amino acids carried by a background polyleucine helix. Indeed, the insertion penalty for arginine as well as the insertion gain for leucine from the translocon to the membrane is found to be significantly reduced compared to direct insertion from water, resulting in the same compression as observed in the experiment-based scale.",
keywords = "Hydrophobicity scale, Membrane-protein insertion, Ribosome, SecY",
author = "James Gumbart and Christophe Chipot and Klaus Schulten",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1012758108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "3596--3601",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Free-energy cost for translocon-assisted insertion of membrane proteins

AU - Gumbart, James

AU - Chipot, Christophe

AU - Schulten, Klaus

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Nascent membrane proteins typically insert in a sequential fashion into the membrane via a protein-conducting channel, the Sec translocon. How this process occurs is still unclear, although a thermodynamic partitioning between the channel and the membrane environment has been proposed. Experiment- and simulation-based scales for the insertion free energy of various amino acids are, however, at variance, the former appearing to lie in a narrower range than the latter. Membrane insertion of arginine, for instance, requires 14-17 kcal?mol according to molecular dynamics simulations, but only 2-3 kcal?mol according to experiment. We suggest that this disagreement is resolved by assuming a two-stage insertion process wherein the first step, the insertion into the translocon, is energized by protein synthesis and, therefore, has an effectively zero free-energy cost; the second step, the insertion into the membrane, invokes the translocon as an intermediary between the fully hydrated and the fully inserted locations. Using free-energy perturbation calculations, the effective transfer free energies from the translocon to the membrane have been determined for both arginine and leucine amino acids carried by a background polyleucine helix. Indeed, the insertion penalty for arginine as well as the insertion gain for leucine from the translocon to the membrane is found to be significantly reduced compared to direct insertion from water, resulting in the same compression as observed in the experiment-based scale.

AB - Nascent membrane proteins typically insert in a sequential fashion into the membrane via a protein-conducting channel, the Sec translocon. How this process occurs is still unclear, although a thermodynamic partitioning between the channel and the membrane environment has been proposed. Experiment- and simulation-based scales for the insertion free energy of various amino acids are, however, at variance, the former appearing to lie in a narrower range than the latter. Membrane insertion of arginine, for instance, requires 14-17 kcal?mol according to molecular dynamics simulations, but only 2-3 kcal?mol according to experiment. We suggest that this disagreement is resolved by assuming a two-stage insertion process wherein the first step, the insertion into the translocon, is energized by protein synthesis and, therefore, has an effectively zero free-energy cost; the second step, the insertion into the membrane, invokes the translocon as an intermediary between the fully hydrated and the fully inserted locations. Using free-energy perturbation calculations, the effective transfer free energies from the translocon to the membrane have been determined for both arginine and leucine amino acids carried by a background polyleucine helix. Indeed, the insertion penalty for arginine as well as the insertion gain for leucine from the translocon to the membrane is found to be significantly reduced compared to direct insertion from water, resulting in the same compression as observed in the experiment-based scale.

KW - Hydrophobicity scale

KW - Membrane-protein insertion

KW - Ribosome

KW - SecY

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952771298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952771298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1012758108

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1012758108

M3 - Article

C2 - 21317362

AN - SCOPUS:79952771298

VL - 108

SP - 3596

EP - 3601

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 9

ER -