Frayed Seams in the "Patchwork Quilt" of American Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of Invasive Plant Species Regulation

JAMES S. NEAL MCCUBBINS, A Bryan Endres, LAUREN QUINN, JACOB N. BARNEY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Implementation of certain state and federal renewable energy mandates will require development of new, higher-yielding plant resources. However, many invasive plant species share biological characteristics with ideal biomass feedstocks, such as rapid growth and ability to outcompete local vegetation, prolific seed generation, adaptability to an assortment of soil and climatic conditions, and lack of, or resistance to, pests and diseases. Next-generation biofuel feedstocks may be more productive and profitable at the individual farm level, but also may pose a greater risk of becoming invasive, thereby damaging the broader ecosystem and the economy. Accordingly, the agronomist's search for yield-maximizing biofuel crops, combined with potties that encourage bioenergy production, prompts a careful re-examination of the regulatory landscape for invasive plants. Our empirical analysis of state regulatory frameworks demonstrates that most states fail to regulate invasive plant species (on average, states restrict only 19.696 of invasive plant species in their jurisdiction) and are ill-prepared to manage potential ecological pressure arising from the introduction of new plants. Our typological analysis of state regulatory structures yielded similarly discouraging results, with no regime exhibiting a statistically significant correlation with improved invasive species regulation. We offer three recommendations to improve state responses to the ecological threats posed by invasive plant species, including: 1) formalization of state invasive species councils within the regulatory structure; 2) improved pro-commercialization control through weed risk assessments; 3) and a negligence-based liability regime to shift economic incentives in order to control the introduction and spread of invasive plant species.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-81
Number of pages47
JournalEnvironmental Law (00462276)
Volume43
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

feedstocks
invasive species
agronomists
economic incentives
energy crops
renewable energy sources
commercialization
bioenergy
biofuels
risk assessment
weed control
pests
farms
vegetation
ecosystems
biomass
seeds
soil

Keywords

  • Renewable energy sources -- Law & legislation
  • Agriculturists
  • Biomass chemicals
  • Energy crops
  • Invasive plants -- Law & legislation
  • Federal government -- United States
  • Empirical research
  • Ecosystem dynamics

Cite this

Frayed Seams in the "Patchwork Quilt" of American Federalism : An Empirical Analysis of Invasive Plant Species Regulation. / NEAL MCCUBBINS, JAMES S.; Endres, A Bryan; QUINN, LAUREN; BARNEY, JACOB N.

In: Environmental Law (00462276), Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 35-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e046c58331604ef0a02361e8a0c30e3c,
title = "Frayed Seams in the {"}Patchwork Quilt{"} of American Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of Invasive Plant Species Regulation",
abstract = "Implementation of certain state and federal renewable energy mandates will require development of new, higher-yielding plant resources. However, many invasive plant species share biological characteristics with ideal biomass feedstocks, such as rapid growth and ability to outcompete local vegetation, prolific seed generation, adaptability to an assortment of soil and climatic conditions, and lack of, or resistance to, pests and diseases. Next-generation biofuel feedstocks may be more productive and profitable at the individual farm level, but also may pose a greater risk of becoming invasive, thereby damaging the broader ecosystem and the economy. Accordingly, the agronomist's search for yield-maximizing biofuel crops, combined with potties that encourage bioenergy production, prompts a careful re-examination of the regulatory landscape for invasive plants. Our empirical analysis of state regulatory frameworks demonstrates that most states fail to regulate invasive plant species (on average, states restrict only 19.696 of invasive plant species in their jurisdiction) and are ill-prepared to manage potential ecological pressure arising from the introduction of new plants. Our typological analysis of state regulatory structures yielded similarly discouraging results, with no regime exhibiting a statistically significant correlation with improved invasive species regulation. We offer three recommendations to improve state responses to the ecological threats posed by invasive plant species, including: 1) formalization of state invasive species councils within the regulatory structure; 2) improved pro-commercialization control through weed risk assessments; 3) and a negligence-based liability regime to shift economic incentives in order to control the introduction and spread of invasive plant species.",
keywords = "Renewable energy sources -- Law & legislation, Agriculturists, Biomass chemicals, Energy crops, Invasive plants -- Law & legislation, Federal government -- United States, Empirical research, Ecosystem dynamics",
author = "{NEAL MCCUBBINS}, {JAMES S.} and Endres, {A Bryan} and LAUREN QUINN and BARNEY, {JACOB N.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "35--81",
journal = "Environmental Law (00462276)",
issn = "0046-2276",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frayed Seams in the "Patchwork Quilt" of American Federalism

T2 - An Empirical Analysis of Invasive Plant Species Regulation

AU - NEAL MCCUBBINS, JAMES S.

AU - Endres, A Bryan

AU - QUINN, LAUREN

AU - BARNEY, JACOB N.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Implementation of certain state and federal renewable energy mandates will require development of new, higher-yielding plant resources. However, many invasive plant species share biological characteristics with ideal biomass feedstocks, such as rapid growth and ability to outcompete local vegetation, prolific seed generation, adaptability to an assortment of soil and climatic conditions, and lack of, or resistance to, pests and diseases. Next-generation biofuel feedstocks may be more productive and profitable at the individual farm level, but also may pose a greater risk of becoming invasive, thereby damaging the broader ecosystem and the economy. Accordingly, the agronomist's search for yield-maximizing biofuel crops, combined with potties that encourage bioenergy production, prompts a careful re-examination of the regulatory landscape for invasive plants. Our empirical analysis of state regulatory frameworks demonstrates that most states fail to regulate invasive plant species (on average, states restrict only 19.696 of invasive plant species in their jurisdiction) and are ill-prepared to manage potential ecological pressure arising from the introduction of new plants. Our typological analysis of state regulatory structures yielded similarly discouraging results, with no regime exhibiting a statistically significant correlation with improved invasive species regulation. We offer three recommendations to improve state responses to the ecological threats posed by invasive plant species, including: 1) formalization of state invasive species councils within the regulatory structure; 2) improved pro-commercialization control through weed risk assessments; 3) and a negligence-based liability regime to shift economic incentives in order to control the introduction and spread of invasive plant species.

AB - Implementation of certain state and federal renewable energy mandates will require development of new, higher-yielding plant resources. However, many invasive plant species share biological characteristics with ideal biomass feedstocks, such as rapid growth and ability to outcompete local vegetation, prolific seed generation, adaptability to an assortment of soil and climatic conditions, and lack of, or resistance to, pests and diseases. Next-generation biofuel feedstocks may be more productive and profitable at the individual farm level, but also may pose a greater risk of becoming invasive, thereby damaging the broader ecosystem and the economy. Accordingly, the agronomist's search for yield-maximizing biofuel crops, combined with potties that encourage bioenergy production, prompts a careful re-examination of the regulatory landscape for invasive plants. Our empirical analysis of state regulatory frameworks demonstrates that most states fail to regulate invasive plant species (on average, states restrict only 19.696 of invasive plant species in their jurisdiction) and are ill-prepared to manage potential ecological pressure arising from the introduction of new plants. Our typological analysis of state regulatory structures yielded similarly discouraging results, with no regime exhibiting a statistically significant correlation with improved invasive species regulation. We offer three recommendations to improve state responses to the ecological threats posed by invasive plant species, including: 1) formalization of state invasive species councils within the regulatory structure; 2) improved pro-commercialization control through weed risk assessments; 3) and a negligence-based liability regime to shift economic incentives in order to control the introduction and spread of invasive plant species.

KW - Renewable energy sources -- Law & legislation

KW - Agriculturists

KW - Biomass chemicals

KW - Energy crops

KW - Invasive plants -- Law & legislation

KW - Federal government -- United States

KW - Empirical research

KW - Ecosystem dynamics

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 35

EP - 81

JO - Environmental Law (00462276)

JF - Environmental Law (00462276)

SN - 0046-2276

IS - 1

ER -