TY - JOUR
T1 - Forests, trees and poverty alleviation
T2 - Policy implications of current knowledge
AU - Miller, Daniel C.
AU - Mansourian, Stephanie
AU - Gabay, Mónica
AU - Hajjar, Reem
AU - Jagger, Pamela
AU - Kamoto, Judith F.M.
AU - Newton, Peter
AU - Oldekop, Johan A.
AU - Razafindratsima, Onja H.
AU - Shyamsundar, Priya
AU - Sunderland, Terry
AU - Wildburger, Christoph
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) and the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture , under Hatch project no. 1009327 . We thank Jennifer Zavaleta Cheek and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) and the United States Department of AgricultureNational Institute of Food and Agriculture, under Hatch project no. 1009327. We thank Jennifer Zavaleta Cheek and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Major advances have been made over the past two decades in our understanding of the contribution forests and trees outside forests make to human well-being across the globe. Yet this knowledge has not always been incorporated into broader poverty and development policy agendas. The result is a missed opportunity to effectively and sustainably reach national and international poverty alleviation goals. Here, we address the need for greater integration of forests and trees in development policy. We distil five key findings based on the current evidence base and discuss their implications for decision-makers. We find that (1) forests and trees are critical to global efforts to end poverty but (2) their benefits to human well-being are unevenly distributed. Although the evidence indicates that (3) forests and trees can help the rural poor as they face profound global changes, it also shows that (4) poorly aligned forest and land use policies and programmes may lead to excessive costs being borne by the poor. However, we do find that (5) policy and management measures exist that can enable forests and trees to effectively address poverty goals even as there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution. Key overarching policy implications of these findings include the need to integrate forests and trees more explicitly into land-use planning and poverty reduction programs, strengthen forest property rights, self-governance and technical skills of forest-reliant communities, and carefully tailor policy measures to the context in which they are implemented.
AB - Major advances have been made over the past two decades in our understanding of the contribution forests and trees outside forests make to human well-being across the globe. Yet this knowledge has not always been incorporated into broader poverty and development policy agendas. The result is a missed opportunity to effectively and sustainably reach national and international poverty alleviation goals. Here, we address the need for greater integration of forests and trees in development policy. We distil five key findings based on the current evidence base and discuss their implications for decision-makers. We find that (1) forests and trees are critical to global efforts to end poverty but (2) their benefits to human well-being are unevenly distributed. Although the evidence indicates that (3) forests and trees can help the rural poor as they face profound global changes, it also shows that (4) poorly aligned forest and land use policies and programmes may lead to excessive costs being borne by the poor. However, we do find that (5) policy and management measures exist that can enable forests and trees to effectively address poverty goals even as there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution. Key overarching policy implications of these findings include the need to integrate forests and trees more explicitly into land-use planning and poverty reduction programs, strengthen forest property rights, self-governance and technical skills of forest-reliant communities, and carefully tailor policy measures to the context in which they are implemented.
KW - Agroforestry
KW - Forest livelihoods
KW - Forest policy
KW - Land-use policy
KW - Poverty alleviation
KW - Sustainable development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112487474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112487474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102566
DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102566
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85112487474
SN - 1389-9341
VL - 131
JO - Forest Policy and Economics
JF - Forest Policy and Economics
M1 - 102566
ER -