TY - JOUR
T1 - Food insecurity and food preparation equipment in US households
T2 - exploratory results from a cross-sectional questionnaire
AU - Oakley, A. R.
AU - Nikolaus, C. J.
AU - Ellison, B.
AU - Nickols-Richardson, S. M.
N1 - Research support from the US Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture (CJN and SMNR) and the McCormick Science Institute (CJN, BE and SMNR) has been received within the last 3 years. CJN also has received funding from a Kraft Human Nutrition fellowship. ARO has no conflict of interest to disclose. These sources of funding are not related to data presented in this manuscript. This work was supported by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. ARO and SMNR actively contributed to the conception and design of the study and data collection. CJN and BE actively contributed to data analyses. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data, drafting of the paper and a critical review of its content and the final version submitted for publication.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Background: Food insecurity (FI) impacted 15.7% (5.9 million) of US households with children in 2017. These households often experience issues within one or more of the food security pillars: access, availability, utilisation or stability. An underexplored area within the pillar of utilisation that may impact FI risk is the availability of kitchen equipment in households. This exploratory project aimed to quantify household food preparation equipment ownership and use by household FI status. Methods: An online platform (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA) was used to administer a questionnaire to a sample of 135 parents of children aged 11–14 years. The instrument queried sociodemographic characteristics, food preparation items owned and frequency of use of 44 items within a 6-month interval. Household FI was measured using the 18-item US Department of Agriculture, Household Food Security Survey Module with a 12-month reference period. Results: Households experiencing FI (n = 39; 28.9%) owned an average of five fewer items than their food secure counterparts (n = 96, 71.1%, P < 0.001), reporting lower item ownership within each equipment category subgroup (i.e. large appliances, small appliances, food preparation utensils and cooking utensils; all P < 0.01). There were no differences between FI and food secure households in frequency of use (all P > 0.01). Conclusions: Compared to food secure households, the number of food preparation items owned was lower, although frequency of use was the same, in US households that were FI. Future projects should investigate how food equipment ownership impacts cooking behaviours, and whether households experiencing FI display behaviours to compensate for a differing set of equipment.
AB - Background: Food insecurity (FI) impacted 15.7% (5.9 million) of US households with children in 2017. These households often experience issues within one or more of the food security pillars: access, availability, utilisation or stability. An underexplored area within the pillar of utilisation that may impact FI risk is the availability of kitchen equipment in households. This exploratory project aimed to quantify household food preparation equipment ownership and use by household FI status. Methods: An online platform (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA) was used to administer a questionnaire to a sample of 135 parents of children aged 11–14 years. The instrument queried sociodemographic characteristics, food preparation items owned and frequency of use of 44 items within a 6-month interval. Household FI was measured using the 18-item US Department of Agriculture, Household Food Security Survey Module with a 12-month reference period. Results: Households experiencing FI (n = 39; 28.9%) owned an average of five fewer items than their food secure counterparts (n = 96, 71.1%, P < 0.001), reporting lower item ownership within each equipment category subgroup (i.e. large appliances, small appliances, food preparation utensils and cooking utensils; all P < 0.01). There were no differences between FI and food secure households in frequency of use (all P > 0.01). Conclusions: Compared to food secure households, the number of food preparation items owned was lower, although frequency of use was the same, in US households that were FI. Future projects should investigate how food equipment ownership impacts cooking behaviours, and whether households experiencing FI display behaviours to compensate for a differing set of equipment.
KW - US households
KW - cooking
KW - food
KW - food preparation equipment
KW - food security
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057482199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057482199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jhn.12615
DO - 10.1111/jhn.12615
M3 - Article
C2 - 30474895
AN - SCOPUS:85057482199
SN - 0952-3871
VL - 32
SP - 143
EP - 151
JO - Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
JF - Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
IS - 2
ER -