Abstract
In his argument for a rereading of opportunity hoarding and related policy prescriptions, David Imbroscio provides evidence for the misdiagnosis of elements of the problem vis-à-vis the entry and exit hypotheses consequentially resulting in limited effectiveness of common “prescribed treatments” for this behavior. His way forward focuses on a fundamental rebalancing of the instruments through which wealth is distributed to create more parity—a breaking up of the hoard. Thinking about his argument, I offer three additional premises that ask us to look more closely at how we treat the symptoms of opportunity hoarding, in a way that reflects the power of the mechanisms that sustain it.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 806-811 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Housing Policy Debate |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Opportunity
- equity
- governance
- hoarding
- racism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Urban Studies
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law