Focus Group Evidence: Implications for Design and Analysis

Katherine E. Ryan, Tysza Gandha, Michael J. Culbertson, Crystal Carlson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In evaluation and applied social research, focus groups may be used to gather different kinds of evidence (e.g., opinion, tacit knowledge). In this article, we argue that making focus group design choices explicitly in relation to the type of evidence required would enhance the empirical value and rigor associated with focus group utilization. We offer a descriptive framework to highlight contrasting design characteristics and the type of evidence they generate. We present examples of focus groups from education and healthcare evaluations to illustrate the relationship between focus group evidence, design, and how focus groups are conducted. To enhance the credibility of focus group evidence and maximize potential learning from this popular qualitative data collection method, we offer a set of questions to guide evaluators reflection and decision making about focus group design and implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-345
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2014

Keywords

  • evaluation methodology
  • focus group design and analysis
  • focus group evidence
  • participant interaction in focus groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Focus Group Evidence: Implications for Design and Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this