TY - JOUR
T1 - Flow directionality of pristine meandering rivers is embedded in the skewing of high-amplitude bends and neck cutoffs
AU - Guo, Xingyan
AU - Chen, Dong
AU - Parker, Gary
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0405203) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779242). We are grateful to Alessandro Frascati for data pertaining to the numerical simulation of meandering channel evolution using the bar-bend theory. X.G. thanks Houpu Yang for financial support and Chenge An for inspiring discussions. G.P. expresses his thanks to Xudong Fu of Tsinghua University, and the H. W. Johnson Professorship for support to visit China in order to work with X.G. and D.C. We thank the reviewers for their insightful reviews.
Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0405203) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779242). We are grateful to Alessandro Frascati for data
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Information concerning the dynamics of river meandering is embedded in their planforms. Here, we focus on how bend skewing varies with increasing sinuosity, and how flow direction is embedded in bend skewing. It has often been thought that upstream-skewed bends are dominant within a sufficiently long reach. These bends may allow a reasonable inference as to the direction of flow. Here we consider this issue using 20 reaches of freely meandering alluvial rivers that are in remote locations, generally far from human influence. We find that low-amplitude bends tend to be downstream-, rather than upstream-skewed. Bends with sinuosity greater than 2.6, however, are predominantly upstream-skewed. Of particular interest are the neck cutoffs, all chosen to be relatively recent according to their position related to the main channel: 84% of these are upstream-skewed. Neck cutoffs, which have likely evolved directly from bends of the highest sinuosity, represent the planform feature most likely to have flow direction embedded in them. The field data suggest that meander bends without external forcing such as engineering works tend to evolve from downstream-skewed low-sinuosity bends to upstream-skewed high-sinuosity bends before cutoff. This process can be reproduced, to some extent, using models coupling sedimentary dynamics with flow dynamics.
AB - Information concerning the dynamics of river meandering is embedded in their planforms. Here, we focus on how bend skewing varies with increasing sinuosity, and how flow direction is embedded in bend skewing. It has often been thought that upstream-skewed bends are dominant within a sufficiently long reach. These bends may allow a reasonable inference as to the direction of flow. Here we consider this issue using 20 reaches of freely meandering alluvial rivers that are in remote locations, generally far from human influence. We find that low-amplitude bends tend to be downstream-, rather than upstream-skewed. Bends with sinuosity greater than 2.6, however, are predominantly upstream-skewed. Of particular interest are the neck cutoffs, all chosen to be relatively recent according to their position related to the main channel: 84% of these are upstream-skewed. Neck cutoffs, which have likely evolved directly from bends of the highest sinuosity, represent the planform feature most likely to have flow direction embedded in them. The field data suggest that meander bends without external forcing such as engineering works tend to evolve from downstream-skewed low-sinuosity bends to upstream-skewed high-sinuosity bends before cutoff. This process can be reproduced, to some extent, using models coupling sedimentary dynamics with flow dynamics.
KW - Alluvial rivers
KW - Bends
KW - Flow direction
KW - Meandering
KW - Planform skewing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075259871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075259871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1910874116
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1910874116
M3 - Article
C2 - 31685630
AN - SCOPUS:85075259871
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 116
SP - 23448
EP - 23454
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 47
ER -