Flexible workplace policies: Lessons from the federal alternative work schedules act

Janet M. Liechty, Elaine A. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This case study uses a feminist framework to examine the 7-year process by which the Federal Alternative Work Schedules Act (1978 - 1985) became law and the reasons for reenergized implementation in the 1990s. We analyze the legislative discourse for rationale in support of and opposition to this policy, connect findings to current flexible work research, and identify criteria for evaluating the impact of flextime policies with attention to intersections of gender and socioeconomic status. Unexpectedly, traditional views on hierarchical manager-worker relations figured more prominently than gender in the Congressional debates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)304-317
Number of pages14
JournalFamily Relations
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Workplace
Appointments and Schedules
workplace
gender
work research
Social Class
social status
opposition
act
manager
worker
Law
discourse
Research

Keywords

  • Family policy
  • Family-friendly work policies
  • Flexible work schedules
  • Flextime
  • Gender
  • Work and family

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Flexible workplace policies : Lessons from the federal alternative work schedules act. / Liechty, Janet M.; Anderson, Elaine A.

In: Family Relations, Vol. 56, No. 3, 01.07.2007, p. 304-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed66b3f9a3264e0d9f98f775ce87be73,
title = "Flexible workplace policies: Lessons from the federal alternative work schedules act",
abstract = "This case study uses a feminist framework to examine the 7-year process by which the Federal Alternative Work Schedules Act (1978 - 1985) became law and the reasons for reenergized implementation in the 1990s. We analyze the legislative discourse for rationale in support of and opposition to this policy, connect findings to current flexible work research, and identify criteria for evaluating the impact of flextime policies with attention to intersections of gender and socioeconomic status. Unexpectedly, traditional views on hierarchical manager-worker relations figured more prominently than gender in the Congressional debates.",
keywords = "Family policy, Family-friendly work policies, Flexible work schedules, Flextime, Gender, Work and family",
author = "Liechty, {Janet M.} and Anderson, {Elaine A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00461.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "304--317",
journal = "Family Relations",
issn = "0197-6664",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexible workplace policies

T2 - Lessons from the federal alternative work schedules act

AU - Liechty, Janet M.

AU - Anderson, Elaine A.

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - This case study uses a feminist framework to examine the 7-year process by which the Federal Alternative Work Schedules Act (1978 - 1985) became law and the reasons for reenergized implementation in the 1990s. We analyze the legislative discourse for rationale in support of and opposition to this policy, connect findings to current flexible work research, and identify criteria for evaluating the impact of flextime policies with attention to intersections of gender and socioeconomic status. Unexpectedly, traditional views on hierarchical manager-worker relations figured more prominently than gender in the Congressional debates.

AB - This case study uses a feminist framework to examine the 7-year process by which the Federal Alternative Work Schedules Act (1978 - 1985) became law and the reasons for reenergized implementation in the 1990s. We analyze the legislative discourse for rationale in support of and opposition to this policy, connect findings to current flexible work research, and identify criteria for evaluating the impact of flextime policies with attention to intersections of gender and socioeconomic status. Unexpectedly, traditional views on hierarchical manager-worker relations figured more prominently than gender in the Congressional debates.

KW - Family policy

KW - Family-friendly work policies

KW - Flexible work schedules

KW - Flextime

KW - Gender

KW - Work and family

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250345964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250345964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00461.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00461.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34250345964

VL - 56

SP - 304

EP - 317

JO - Family Relations

JF - Family Relations

SN - 0197-6664

IS - 3

ER -