TY - JOUR
T1 - Flexibility in the face of fear
T2 - hippocampal–prefrontal regulation of fear and avoidance
AU - Moscarello, Justin M.
AU - Maren, Stephen
N1 - Supported by grants from the NIH ( R01MH065961 ) a McKnight Memory and Cognitive Disorders Award to SM and a Brain and Behavior Research Foundation Young Investigator Award to JMM.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Generating appropriate defensive behaviors in the face of threat is essential to survival. Although many of these behaviors are ‘hard-wired’, they are also flexible. For example, Pavlovian fear conditioning generates learned defensive responses, such as conditioned freezing, that can be suppressed through extinction. The expression of extinguished responses is highly context-dependent, allowing animals to engage behavioral responses appropriate to the contexts in which threats are encountered. Likewise, animals and humans will avoid noxious outcomes if given the opportunity. In instrumental avoidance learning, for example, animals overcome conditioned defensive responses, including freezing, in order to actively avoid aversive stimuli. Recent work has greatly advanced understanding of the neural basis of these phenomena and has revealed common circuits involved in the regulation of fear. Specifically, the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex play pivotal roles in gating fear reactions and instrumental actions, mediated by the amygdala and nucleus accumbens, respectively. Because an inability to adaptively regulate fear and defensive behavior is a central component of many anxiety disorders, the brain circuits that promote flexible responses to threat are of great clinical significance.
AB - Generating appropriate defensive behaviors in the face of threat is essential to survival. Although many of these behaviors are ‘hard-wired’, they are also flexible. For example, Pavlovian fear conditioning generates learned defensive responses, such as conditioned freezing, that can be suppressed through extinction. The expression of extinguished responses is highly context-dependent, allowing animals to engage behavioral responses appropriate to the contexts in which threats are encountered. Likewise, animals and humans will avoid noxious outcomes if given the opportunity. In instrumental avoidance learning, for example, animals overcome conditioned defensive responses, including freezing, in order to actively avoid aversive stimuli. Recent work has greatly advanced understanding of the neural basis of these phenomena and has revealed common circuits involved in the regulation of fear. Specifically, the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex play pivotal roles in gating fear reactions and instrumental actions, mediated by the amygdala and nucleus accumbens, respectively. Because an inability to adaptively regulate fear and defensive behavior is a central component of many anxiety disorders, the brain circuits that promote flexible responses to threat are of great clinical significance.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85030665243
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85030665243#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.010
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85030665243
SN - 2352-1546
VL - 19
SP - 44
EP - 49
JO - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
JF - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
ER -