Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information

Edward W. Wlotko, Kara D Federmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The cerebral hemispheres have been shown to be differentially sensitive to sentence-level information; in particular, it has been suggested that only the left hemisphere (LH) makes predictions about upcoming items, whereas the right (RH) processes words in a more integrative fashion. The current study used event-related potentials to jointly examine the effects of expectancy and sentential constraint on word processing. Expected and unexpected but plausible words matched for contextual fit were inserted into strongly and weakly constraining sentence frames and presented to the left and right visual fields (LVF and RVF). Consistent with the prediction/integration view, the P2 was sensitive to constraint: words in strongly constraining contexts elicited larger P2s than those in less predictive contexts, for RVF/LH presentation only. N400 responses for both VFs departed from the typical pattern of amplitudes graded by cloze probability. Expected endings in strongly and weakly constraining contexts were facilitated to a similar degree with RVF/LH presentation, and expected endings in weakly constraining contexts were not facilitated compared to unexpected endings in those contexts for LVF/RH presentation. These data suggest that responses seen for central presentation reflect contributions from both hemispheres. Finally, a late positivity, larger for unexpected endings in strongly constraining contexts, observed for these stimuli with central presentation was not seen here for either VF. Thus, some phenomena observed with central presentation may be an emergent property of mechanisms that require interhemispheric cooperation. These data highlight the importance of understanding hemispheric asymmetries and their implications for normal language processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3001-3014
Number of pages14
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume45
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 12 2007

Fingerprint

Word Processing
Cerebrum
Visual Fields
Evoked Potentials
Language

Keywords

  • Event-related potentials
  • Hemispheric differences
  • Language
  • N400
  • Sentence processing
  • Sentential constraint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Finding the right word : Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information. / Wlotko, Edward W.; Federmeier, Kara D.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 45, No. 13, 12.09.2007, p. 3001-3014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e257fcbd906d4e12ae3e8662c43552e4,
title = "Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information",
abstract = "The cerebral hemispheres have been shown to be differentially sensitive to sentence-level information; in particular, it has been suggested that only the left hemisphere (LH) makes predictions about upcoming items, whereas the right (RH) processes words in a more integrative fashion. The current study used event-related potentials to jointly examine the effects of expectancy and sentential constraint on word processing. Expected and unexpected but plausible words matched for contextual fit were inserted into strongly and weakly constraining sentence frames and presented to the left and right visual fields (LVF and RVF). Consistent with the prediction/integration view, the P2 was sensitive to constraint: words in strongly constraining contexts elicited larger P2s than those in less predictive contexts, for RVF/LH presentation only. N400 responses for both VFs departed from the typical pattern of amplitudes graded by cloze probability. Expected endings in strongly and weakly constraining contexts were facilitated to a similar degree with RVF/LH presentation, and expected endings in weakly constraining contexts were not facilitated compared to unexpected endings in those contexts for LVF/RH presentation. These data suggest that responses seen for central presentation reflect contributions from both hemispheres. Finally, a late positivity, larger for unexpected endings in strongly constraining contexts, observed for these stimuli with central presentation was not seen here for either VF. Thus, some phenomena observed with central presentation may be an emergent property of mechanisms that require interhemispheric cooperation. These data highlight the importance of understanding hemispheric asymmetries and their implications for normal language processing.",
keywords = "Event-related potentials, Hemispheric differences, Language, N400, Sentence processing, Sentential constraint",
author = "Wlotko, {Edward W.} and Federmeier, {Kara D}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "3001--3014",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finding the right word

T2 - Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information

AU - Wlotko, Edward W.

AU - Federmeier, Kara D

PY - 2007/9/12

Y1 - 2007/9/12

N2 - The cerebral hemispheres have been shown to be differentially sensitive to sentence-level information; in particular, it has been suggested that only the left hemisphere (LH) makes predictions about upcoming items, whereas the right (RH) processes words in a more integrative fashion. The current study used event-related potentials to jointly examine the effects of expectancy and sentential constraint on word processing. Expected and unexpected but plausible words matched for contextual fit were inserted into strongly and weakly constraining sentence frames and presented to the left and right visual fields (LVF and RVF). Consistent with the prediction/integration view, the P2 was sensitive to constraint: words in strongly constraining contexts elicited larger P2s than those in less predictive contexts, for RVF/LH presentation only. N400 responses for both VFs departed from the typical pattern of amplitudes graded by cloze probability. Expected endings in strongly and weakly constraining contexts were facilitated to a similar degree with RVF/LH presentation, and expected endings in weakly constraining contexts were not facilitated compared to unexpected endings in those contexts for LVF/RH presentation. These data suggest that responses seen for central presentation reflect contributions from both hemispheres. Finally, a late positivity, larger for unexpected endings in strongly constraining contexts, observed for these stimuli with central presentation was not seen here for either VF. Thus, some phenomena observed with central presentation may be an emergent property of mechanisms that require interhemispheric cooperation. These data highlight the importance of understanding hemispheric asymmetries and their implications for normal language processing.

AB - The cerebral hemispheres have been shown to be differentially sensitive to sentence-level information; in particular, it has been suggested that only the left hemisphere (LH) makes predictions about upcoming items, whereas the right (RH) processes words in a more integrative fashion. The current study used event-related potentials to jointly examine the effects of expectancy and sentential constraint on word processing. Expected and unexpected but plausible words matched for contextual fit were inserted into strongly and weakly constraining sentence frames and presented to the left and right visual fields (LVF and RVF). Consistent with the prediction/integration view, the P2 was sensitive to constraint: words in strongly constraining contexts elicited larger P2s than those in less predictive contexts, for RVF/LH presentation only. N400 responses for both VFs departed from the typical pattern of amplitudes graded by cloze probability. Expected endings in strongly and weakly constraining contexts were facilitated to a similar degree with RVF/LH presentation, and expected endings in weakly constraining contexts were not facilitated compared to unexpected endings in those contexts for LVF/RH presentation. These data suggest that responses seen for central presentation reflect contributions from both hemispheres. Finally, a late positivity, larger for unexpected endings in strongly constraining contexts, observed for these stimuli with central presentation was not seen here for either VF. Thus, some phenomena observed with central presentation may be an emergent property of mechanisms that require interhemispheric cooperation. These data highlight the importance of understanding hemispheric asymmetries and their implications for normal language processing.

KW - Event-related potentials

KW - Hemispheric differences

KW - Language

KW - N400

KW - Sentence processing

KW - Sentential constraint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548482227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548482227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.013

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 17659309

AN - SCOPUS:34548482227

VL - 45

SP - 3001

EP - 3014

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 13

ER -