TY - JOUR
T1 - Filtering across Spatial Scales
T2 - Phylogeny, Biogeography and Community Structure in Bumble Bees
AU - Harmon-Threatt, Alexandra N.
AU - Ackerly, David D.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the Kremen and Ackerly Labs, and the 2009 Integrative Biology 200B class at University of California Berkeley for comments that improved the manuscript, and acknowledge funding from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program. We would also like to thank Sheila Colla, Amber Tripodi, Rosemary Malfi, Carol Kearns, Richard Hartfeld and Stephen Hendrix for contributing data on bumble bee communities.
PY - 2013/3/27
Y1 - 2013/3/27
N2 - Despite the expansion of phylogenetic community analysis to understand community assembly, few studies have used these methods on mobile organisms and it has been suggested the local scales that are typically considered may be too small to represent the community as perceived by organisms with high mobility. Mobility is believed to allow species to mediate competitive interactions quickly and thus highly mobile species may appear randomly assembled in local communities. At larger scales, however, biogeographical processes could cause communities to be either phylogenetically clustered or even. Using phylogenetic community analysis we examined patterns of relatedness and trait similarity in communities of bumble bees (Bombus) across spatial scales comparing: local communities to regional pools, regional communities to continental pools and the continental community to a global species pool. Species composition and data on tongue lengths, a key foraging trait, were used to test patterns of relatedness and trait similarity across scales. Although expected to exhibit limiting similarity, local communities were clustered both phenotypically and phylogenetically. Larger spatial scales were also found to have more phylogenetic clustering but less trait clustering. While patterns of relatedness in mobile species have previously been suggested to exhibit less structure in local communities and to be less clustered than immobile species, we suggest that mobility may actually allow communities to have more similar species that can simply limit direct competition through mobility.
AB - Despite the expansion of phylogenetic community analysis to understand community assembly, few studies have used these methods on mobile organisms and it has been suggested the local scales that are typically considered may be too small to represent the community as perceived by organisms with high mobility. Mobility is believed to allow species to mediate competitive interactions quickly and thus highly mobile species may appear randomly assembled in local communities. At larger scales, however, biogeographical processes could cause communities to be either phylogenetically clustered or even. Using phylogenetic community analysis we examined patterns of relatedness and trait similarity in communities of bumble bees (Bombus) across spatial scales comparing: local communities to regional pools, regional communities to continental pools and the continental community to a global species pool. Species composition and data on tongue lengths, a key foraging trait, were used to test patterns of relatedness and trait similarity across scales. Although expected to exhibit limiting similarity, local communities were clustered both phenotypically and phylogenetically. Larger spatial scales were also found to have more phylogenetic clustering but less trait clustering. While patterns of relatedness in mobile species have previously been suggested to exhibit less structure in local communities and to be less clustered than immobile species, we suggest that mobility may actually allow communities to have more similar species that can simply limit direct competition through mobility.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875426990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875426990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0060446
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0060446
M3 - Article
C2 - 23544141
AN - SCOPUS:84875426990
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 8
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 3
M1 - e60446
ER -