TY - JOUR
T1 - Field Borders Provide Winter Refuge for Beneficial Predators and Parasitoids
T2 - A Case Study on Organic Farms
AU - Clem, C. Scott
AU - Harmon-Threatt, Alexandra N.
N1 - This work was supported by the USDA North Central Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) [award number 2016-38640-25381] and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Education and Workforce Development Predoctoral Fellowship [grant 2019-67011-29]. We thank Wendel Lutz, Jeff and Rita Glazik, Harold Wilken, and Ryan Butzow for allowing us to use their properties for this project. We also thank Dallas Glazik for helping us find sites and connect with farmers. Thank you to Rufus Isaacs and members of his lab at Michigan State University for allowing us to borrow emergence tents for this study. Finally, thank you to May Berenbaum, Andy Suarez, Susan Ratcliffe, Karl Roeder, Nick Anderson, Jonathan Tetlie, Morgan Mackert, Benjamin Chiavini, and Anna Grommes for reviewing an earlier version of this manuscript.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Semi-natural field borders are frequently used in midwestern U.S. sustainable agriculture. These habitats are meant to help diversify otherwise monocultural landscapes and provision them with ecosystem services, including biological control. Predatory and parasitic arthropods (i.e., potential natural enemies) often flourish in these habitats and may move into crops to help control pests. However, detailed information on the capacity of semi-natural field borders for providing overwintering refuge for these arthropods is poorly understood. In this study, we used soil emergence tents to characterize potential natural enemy communities (i.e., predacious beetles, wasps, spiders, and other arthropods) overwintering in cultivated organic crop fields and adjacent field borders. We found a greater abundance, species richness, and unique community composition of predatory and parasitic arthropods in field borders compared to arable crop fields, which were generally poorly suited as overwintering habitat. Furthermore, potential natural enemies tended to be positively associated with forb cover and negatively associated with grass cover, suggesting that grassy field borders with less forb cover are less well-suited as winter refugia. These results demonstrate that semi-natural habitats like field borders may act as a source for many natural enemies on a year-to-year basis and are important for conserving arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes.
AB - Semi-natural field borders are frequently used in midwestern U.S. sustainable agriculture. These habitats are meant to help diversify otherwise monocultural landscapes and provision them with ecosystem services, including biological control. Predatory and parasitic arthropods (i.e., potential natural enemies) often flourish in these habitats and may move into crops to help control pests. However, detailed information on the capacity of semi-natural field borders for providing overwintering refuge for these arthropods is poorly understood. In this study, we used soil emergence tents to characterize potential natural enemy communities (i.e., predacious beetles, wasps, spiders, and other arthropods) overwintering in cultivated organic crop fields and adjacent field borders. We found a greater abundance, species richness, and unique community composition of predatory and parasitic arthropods in field borders compared to arable crop fields, which were generally poorly suited as overwintering habitat. Furthermore, potential natural enemies tended to be positively associated with forb cover and negatively associated with grass cover, suggesting that grassy field borders with less forb cover are less well-suited as winter refugia. These results demonstrate that semi-natural habitats like field borders may act as a source for many natural enemies on a year-to-year basis and are important for conserving arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes.
KW - conservation biological control
KW - field border
KW - natural enemy
KW - organic farming
KW - semi-natural habitat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105745613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105745613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jisesa/ieab027
DO - 10.1093/jisesa/ieab027
M3 - Article
C2 - 33964162
AN - SCOPUS:85105745613
SN - 1536-2442
VL - 21
JO - Journal of insect science (Online)
JF - Journal of insect science (Online)
IS - 3
M1 - 2
ER -