Federalism Friction in the First Year of the Trump Presidency

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over the last twelve months or so, federalism principles have been repeatedly invoked by state and local governments in a range of lawsuits and legislative proposals seeking to block or temper federal policy initiatives emanating from the new Administration of President Donald Trump. In this essay, I hope to sketch out a few of the more high-profile federalism flashpoints that have emerged over the past year or so, and offer some preliminary assessments of some of the decisions that lower courts (and legislative bodies) have been rendering in some of them. I try to highlight areas of agreement and areas of divergence. And even as to some areas of agreement, I try to explore plausible arguments to be made that the Supreme Court will (and in some cases perhaps should) see things differently as these disputes begin to make their way up the appellate ladder in the coming months and years.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-428
JournalHastings Constitutional Law Quarterly
Volume45
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2018

Fingerprint

federalism
federal policy
lawsuit
divergence
Supreme Court
president

Cite this

Federalism Friction in the First Year of the Trump Presidency. / Amar, Vikram D.

In: Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2018, p. 401-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1015302dd36493190f25e7173cbc709,
title = "Federalism Friction in the First Year of the Trump Presidency",
abstract = "Over the last twelve months or so, federalism principles have been repeatedly invoked by state and local governments in a range of lawsuits and legislative proposals seeking to block or temper federal policy initiatives emanating from the new Administration of President Donald Trump. In this essay, I hope to sketch out a few of the more high-profile federalism flashpoints that have emerged over the past year or so, and offer some preliminary assessments of some of the decisions that lower courts (and legislative bodies) have been rendering in some of them. I try to highlight areas of agreement and areas of divergence. And even as to some areas of agreement, I try to explore plausible arguments to be made that the Supreme Court will (and in some cases perhaps should) see things differently as these disputes begin to make their way up the appellate ladder in the coming months and years.",
author = "Amar, {Vikram D}",
year = "2018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "401--428",
journal = "Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Federalism Friction in the First Year of the Trump Presidency

AU - Amar, Vikram D

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Over the last twelve months or so, federalism principles have been repeatedly invoked by state and local governments in a range of lawsuits and legislative proposals seeking to block or temper federal policy initiatives emanating from the new Administration of President Donald Trump. In this essay, I hope to sketch out a few of the more high-profile federalism flashpoints that have emerged over the past year or so, and offer some preliminary assessments of some of the decisions that lower courts (and legislative bodies) have been rendering in some of them. I try to highlight areas of agreement and areas of divergence. And even as to some areas of agreement, I try to explore plausible arguments to be made that the Supreme Court will (and in some cases perhaps should) see things differently as these disputes begin to make their way up the appellate ladder in the coming months and years.

AB - Over the last twelve months or so, federalism principles have been repeatedly invoked by state and local governments in a range of lawsuits and legislative proposals seeking to block or temper federal policy initiatives emanating from the new Administration of President Donald Trump. In this essay, I hope to sketch out a few of the more high-profile federalism flashpoints that have emerged over the past year or so, and offer some preliminary assessments of some of the decisions that lower courts (and legislative bodies) have been rendering in some of them. I try to highlight areas of agreement and areas of divergence. And even as to some areas of agreement, I try to explore plausible arguments to be made that the Supreme Court will (and in some cases perhaps should) see things differently as these disputes begin to make their way up the appellate ladder in the coming months and years.

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 401

EP - 428

JO - Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly

JF - Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly

IS - 3

ER -