Febris Erotica: Aleksandr Herzen's post-romantic physiology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article explores Aleksandr Herzen's use of the lovesickness topos in his novel Kto vinovat? (1847) in the context of the long literary and medical traditions of lovesickness and the specifically Russian situation of the 1840s. Valeria Sobol argues that Herzen was among the first Russian writers to exploit the semiotics and diagnostics of lovesickness in order to address the questions of human spirituality and the status of scientific knowledge. Given Herzen's frequently proclaimed antispiritualist and antidualist position and the novel's apparent anti-Romantic pathos, one would expect him to reject the essentially dualist notion of lovesickness as a "malady of the soul," but the novel presents a far more complex picture. Herzen's struggle to reconcile the new scientific spirit of his age with the Romantic heritage reflects the transitional nature of the decade in which the novel was written.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-522
Number of pages21
JournalSlavic Review
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006

Fingerprint

physiology
spirituality
semiotics
diagnostic
writer
knowledge
Physiology
Erotica
Herzen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Febris Erotica : Aleksandr Herzen's post-romantic physiology. / Sobol, Valeria.

In: Slavic Review, Vol. 65, No. 3, 01.09.2006, p. 502-522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b0e4d34a89c449093425f1868fc5e23,
title = "Febris Erotica: Aleksandr Herzen's post-romantic physiology",
abstract = "This article explores Aleksandr Herzen's use of the lovesickness topos in his novel Kto vinovat? (1847) in the context of the long literary and medical traditions of lovesickness and the specifically Russian situation of the 1840s. Valeria Sobol argues that Herzen was among the first Russian writers to exploit the semiotics and diagnostics of lovesickness in order to address the questions of human spirituality and the status of scientific knowledge. Given Herzen's frequently proclaimed antispiritualist and antidualist position and the novel's apparent anti-Romantic pathos, one would expect him to reject the essentially dualist notion of lovesickness as a {"}malady of the soul,{"} but the novel presents a far more complex picture. Herzen's struggle to reconcile the new scientific spirit of his age with the Romantic heritage reflects the transitional nature of the decade in which the novel was written.",
author = "Valeria Sobol",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/4148661",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "502--522",
journal = "Slavic Review",
issn = "0037-6779",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Febris Erotica

T2 - Aleksandr Herzen's post-romantic physiology

AU - Sobol, Valeria

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - This article explores Aleksandr Herzen's use of the lovesickness topos in his novel Kto vinovat? (1847) in the context of the long literary and medical traditions of lovesickness and the specifically Russian situation of the 1840s. Valeria Sobol argues that Herzen was among the first Russian writers to exploit the semiotics and diagnostics of lovesickness in order to address the questions of human spirituality and the status of scientific knowledge. Given Herzen's frequently proclaimed antispiritualist and antidualist position and the novel's apparent anti-Romantic pathos, one would expect him to reject the essentially dualist notion of lovesickness as a "malady of the soul," but the novel presents a far more complex picture. Herzen's struggle to reconcile the new scientific spirit of his age with the Romantic heritage reflects the transitional nature of the decade in which the novel was written.

AB - This article explores Aleksandr Herzen's use of the lovesickness topos in his novel Kto vinovat? (1847) in the context of the long literary and medical traditions of lovesickness and the specifically Russian situation of the 1840s. Valeria Sobol argues that Herzen was among the first Russian writers to exploit the semiotics and diagnostics of lovesickness in order to address the questions of human spirituality and the status of scientific knowledge. Given Herzen's frequently proclaimed antispiritualist and antidualist position and the novel's apparent anti-Romantic pathos, one would expect him to reject the essentially dualist notion of lovesickness as a "malady of the soul," but the novel presents a far more complex picture. Herzen's struggle to reconcile the new scientific spirit of his age with the Romantic heritage reflects the transitional nature of the decade in which the novel was written.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748543897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748543897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/4148661

DO - 10.2307/4148661

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748543897

VL - 65

SP - 502

EP - 522

JO - Slavic Review

JF - Slavic Review

SN - 0037-6779

IS - 3

ER -