TY - JOUR
T1 - Fast robust nanopositioning - A linear-matrix-inequalities-based optimal control approach
AU - Lee, Chibum
AU - Salapaka, Srinivasa M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received October 22, 2008; revised March 21, 2009. Current version published August 14, 2009. Recommended by Guest Editor A. Ferreira. This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant ECS 0449310 CAR and Grant CMMI 08-00863.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - This paper proposes a 2-DOF robust optimal control design method for achieving multiple objectives of resolution, bandwidth, and robustness to modeling uncertainties in nanopositioning systems. The main theoretical contribution of this paper is the formulation of a multiobjective 2-DOF optimal control problem in terms of linear matrix inequalities, which are then solved using standard convex optimization tools. The main distinguishing feature of this approach is the flexibility this method provides in formulating and solving the optimization problems that results in achieving a larger set of performance specifications. It facilitates solving of a certain class of mixed-norm optimization and pole-placement problems that arise naturally in nanopositioning systems. This methodology is demonstrated through experiments on a nanopositioning system that archives performance specifications, which are impossible with 1-DOF designs. Experimental results also demonstrate over 200% improvement in bandwidth of the resulting nanopositioning system over the optimal 1-DOF control designed for the same resolution and robustness specifications.
AB - This paper proposes a 2-DOF robust optimal control design method for achieving multiple objectives of resolution, bandwidth, and robustness to modeling uncertainties in nanopositioning systems. The main theoretical contribution of this paper is the formulation of a multiobjective 2-DOF optimal control problem in terms of linear matrix inequalities, which are then solved using standard convex optimization tools. The main distinguishing feature of this approach is the flexibility this method provides in formulating and solving the optimization problems that results in achieving a larger set of performance specifications. It facilitates solving of a certain class of mixed-norm optimization and pole-placement problems that arise naturally in nanopositioning systems. This methodology is demonstrated through experiments on a nanopositioning system that archives performance specifications, which are impossible with 1-DOF designs. Experimental results also demonstrate over 200% improvement in bandwidth of the resulting nanopositioning system over the optimal 1-DOF control designed for the same resolution and robustness specifications.
KW - 2-DOF control design
KW - High bandwidth
KW - High resolution
KW - Linear matrix inequalities (LMIs)
KW - Robust nanopositioning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69549114282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69549114282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMECH.2009.2023903
DO - 10.1109/TMECH.2009.2023903
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:69549114282
SN - 1083-4435
VL - 14
SP - 414
EP - 422
JO - IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
JF - IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
IS - 4
ER -