TY - JOUR
T1 - Farmer participatory research advances sustainable agriculture
T2 - Lessons from Michigan and Malawi
AU - Snapp, Sieglinde S.
AU - Dedecker, James
AU - Davis, Adam S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Our profound thanks to the farmers in Malawi and Michigan who so generously shared their time and experience. Michigan State University (MSU) AgBioResearch, MSU Extension, and Malawi Extension services provided key support that has make this collaborative work possible. Finally, we are thankful to USAID Feed the Future and IITA for investing in Africa RISING and transformative agroecological research for development (http://globalchangescience. org/eastafricanode, accessed 15 Aug. 2019).
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Sustainable production for field crops has proved to be a challenging proposition. Farmer participatory research (FPR) is an important approach to help ensure relevance and define locally adapted solutions for enhanced adoption of sustainable agriculture (SA) technologies. The mother and baby trial (MBT) design has proved effective as a FPR approach to address challenges on smallholder farms. The MBT systematically links long-term “mother” trials, where slow and erratic processes can be monitored, to “baby” trials led by farmers to capture a wide range of farm practices and environmental contexts. Communication and learning is facilitated through MBTs as well. This distributed FPR approach documents the performance of technologies in diverse contexts and provides multiple opportunities for joint planning, observation, and reflection. We describe two MBT case studies, one within a developing country context (Malawi) and the other representing a novel application of MBT within an intensive agriculture context (Michigan). To explore tradeoffs in SA performance, multiple domains (productivity, environmental, and economic) are presented via radar charts as a visualization tool. In both FPR experiences, farmer perspectives and a wide range of practices were revealed. In Malawi, a mesic site was associated with steep SA tradeoffs compared with a marginal site. In Michigan, diversity in tillage practices, field crop performance, and soil health were found to be conditioned by the environment. Overall, the MBT approach supported the development of SA technologies adapted to local conditions.
AB - Sustainable production for field crops has proved to be a challenging proposition. Farmer participatory research (FPR) is an important approach to help ensure relevance and define locally adapted solutions for enhanced adoption of sustainable agriculture (SA) technologies. The mother and baby trial (MBT) design has proved effective as a FPR approach to address challenges on smallholder farms. The MBT systematically links long-term “mother” trials, where slow and erratic processes can be monitored, to “baby” trials led by farmers to capture a wide range of farm practices and environmental contexts. Communication and learning is facilitated through MBTs as well. This distributed FPR approach documents the performance of technologies in diverse contexts and provides multiple opportunities for joint planning, observation, and reflection. We describe two MBT case studies, one within a developing country context (Malawi) and the other representing a novel application of MBT within an intensive agriculture context (Michigan). To explore tradeoffs in SA performance, multiple domains (productivity, environmental, and economic) are presented via radar charts as a visualization tool. In both FPR experiences, farmer perspectives and a wide range of practices were revealed. In Malawi, a mesic site was associated with steep SA tradeoffs compared with a marginal site. In Michigan, diversity in tillage practices, field crop performance, and soil health were found to be conditioned by the environment. Overall, the MBT approach supported the development of SA technologies adapted to local conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078005287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078005287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2134/agronj2018.12.0769
DO - 10.2134/agronj2018.12.0769
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078005287
VL - 111
SP - 2681
EP - 2691
JO - Agronomy Journal
JF - Agronomy Journal
SN - 0002-1962
IS - 6
ER -