False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Empirical research on public opinion has tended to misjudge the normative rationales for modern democracy. Although it is often presumed that citizens' policy preferences are the opinions of interest to democratic theorists, and that democracy requires a highly informed citizenry, neither of these premises represents a dominant position in mainstream democratic theory. Besides incorrect assumptions about major tenets of democratic theory, empirical research on civic engagement is running into dead ends that will require normative analysis to overcome. Bringing political philosophy back in to the study of public opinion can not only remedy shortcomings in the empirical literature, but can also underscore how relevant that literature is for a wide range of problems in democratic practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-104
Number of pages30
JournalCritical Review
Volume18
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

opinion research
public opinion
empirical research
democracy
political philosophy
remedies
citizen
literature
Empirical Research
Democratic Theory
Democracy
False Starts
Public Opinion
Civic Engagement
Political philosophy
Tenets
Theorists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research. / Althaus, Scott.

In: Critical Review, Vol. 18, No. 1-3, 01.01.2006, p. 75-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92922b46025249349bedb4977cb723f9,
title = "False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research",
abstract = "Empirical research on public opinion has tended to misjudge the normative rationales for modern democracy. Although it is often presumed that citizens' policy preferences are the opinions of interest to democratic theorists, and that democracy requires a highly informed citizenry, neither of these premises represents a dominant position in mainstream democratic theory. Besides incorrect assumptions about major tenets of democratic theory, empirical research on civic engagement is running into dead ends that will require normative analysis to overcome. Bringing political philosophy back in to the study of public opinion can not only remedy shortcomings in the empirical literature, but can also underscore how relevant that literature is for a wide range of problems in democratic practice.",
author = "Scott Althaus",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08913810608443651",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "75--104",
journal = "Critical Review",
issn = "0891-3811",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research

AU - Althaus, Scott

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Empirical research on public opinion has tended to misjudge the normative rationales for modern democracy. Although it is often presumed that citizens' policy preferences are the opinions of interest to democratic theorists, and that democracy requires a highly informed citizenry, neither of these premises represents a dominant position in mainstream democratic theory. Besides incorrect assumptions about major tenets of democratic theory, empirical research on civic engagement is running into dead ends that will require normative analysis to overcome. Bringing political philosophy back in to the study of public opinion can not only remedy shortcomings in the empirical literature, but can also underscore how relevant that literature is for a wide range of problems in democratic practice.

AB - Empirical research on public opinion has tended to misjudge the normative rationales for modern democracy. Although it is often presumed that citizens' policy preferences are the opinions of interest to democratic theorists, and that democracy requires a highly informed citizenry, neither of these premises represents a dominant position in mainstream democratic theory. Besides incorrect assumptions about major tenets of democratic theory, empirical research on civic engagement is running into dead ends that will require normative analysis to overcome. Bringing political philosophy back in to the study of public opinion can not only remedy shortcomings in the empirical literature, but can also underscore how relevant that literature is for a wide range of problems in democratic practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846153609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846153609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08913810608443651

DO - 10.1080/08913810608443651

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33846153609

VL - 18

SP - 75

EP - 104

JO - Critical Review

JF - Critical Review

SN - 0891-3811

IS - 1-3

ER -