Abstract
The term ‘fake news’ aims to delegitimize news and is weaponized by political leaders and partisan media. Research has noted the negative impact of the phrase ‘fake news’ yet little work has investigated alternative discourse. We explore whether the phrase ‘fake news’ is distinct from alternative phrases such as ‘misinformation’ and ‘false news.’ Using two experiments, we compare effects of these phrases on evaluations of trust and credibility regarding U.S. news media. Results indicate that ‘fake news’ exerts disproportionate negative effects on perceptions of news and journalists, when controlling for political ideology, compared to ‘misinformation.’ Effects are pronounced when the phrase is used by a politician. Findings challenge research to address the communicative underpinnings of the fake news phenomenon rather than focus on “fake news” as a varietal of misinformation. Insights are discussed for news organizations seeking to distance themselves from the term while providing audiences with accurate information.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 424-443 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Communication Research |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Fake news
- elite discourse
- experiment
- false news
- misinformation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Language and Linguistics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fake news by any other name: phrases for false content and effects on public perceptions of U.S. news media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
Does a 'fake news' label help audiences identify false information?
1/11/23
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Expert Comment / Interview