Fair principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations

Annika Jacobsen; Ricardo de Miranda Azevedo; Nick Juty; Dominique Batista; Simon Coles; Ronald Cornet; Mélanie Courtot; Mercè Crosas; Michel Dumontier; Chris T. Evelo; Carole Goble; Giancarlo Guizzardi; Karsten Kryger Hansen; Ali Hasnain; Kristina Hettne; Jaap Heringa; Rob W.W. Hooft; Melanie Imming; Keith G. Jeffery; Rajaram Kaliyaperumal; Martijn G. Kersloot; Christine R. Kirkpatrick; Tobias Kuhn; Ignasi Labastida; Barbara Magagna; Peter McQuilton; Natalie Meyers; Annalisa Montesanti; Mirjam van Reisen; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Robert Pergl; Susanna Assunta Sansone; Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos; Juliane Schneider; George Strawn; Mark Thompson; Andra Waagmeester; Tobias Weigel; Mark D. Wilkinson; Egon L. Willighagen; Peter Wittenburg; Marco Roos; Barend Mons; Erik Schultes

doi:10.1162/dint_r_00024

Fair principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations

Annika Jacobsen, Ricardo de Miranda Azevedo, Nick Juty, Dominique Batista, Simon Coles, Ronald Cornet, Mélanie Courtot, Mercè Crosas, Michel Dumontier, Chris T. Evelo, Carole Goble, Giancarlo Guizzardi, Karsten Kryger Hansen, Ali Hasnain, Kristina Hettne, Jaap Heringa, Rob W.W. Hooft, Melanie Imming, Keith G. Jeffery, Rajaram KaliyaperumalMartijn G. Kersloot, Christine R. Kirkpatrick, Tobias Kuhn, Ignasi Labastida, Barbara Magagna, Peter McQuilton, Natalie Meyers, Annalisa Montesanti, Mirjam van Reisen, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Robert Pergl, Susanna Assunta Sansone, Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos, Juliane Schneider, George Strawn, Mark Thompson, Andra Waagmeester, Tobias Weigel, Mark D. Wilkinson, Egon L. Willighagen, Peter Wittenburg, Marco Roos, Barend Mons, Erik Schultes

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

Abstract

The FAIR principles have been widely cited, endorsed and adopted by a broad range of stakeholders since their publication in 2016. By intention, the 15 FAIR guiding principles do not dictate specific technological implementations, but provide guidance for improving Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of digital resources. This has likely contributed to the broad adoption of the FAIR principles, because individual stakeholder communities can implement their own FAIR solutions. However, it has also resulted in inconsistent interpretations that carry the risk of leading to incompatible implementations. Thus, while the FAIR principles are formulated on a high level and may be interpreted and implemented in different ways, for true interoperability we need to support convergence in implementation choices that are widely accessible and (re)-usable. We introduce the concept of FAIR implementation considerations to assist accelerated global participation and convergence towards accessible, robust, widespread and consistent FAIR implementations. Any self-identified stakeholder community may either choose to reuse solutions from existing implementations, or when they spot a gap, accept the challenge to create the needed solution, which, ideally, can be used again by other communities in the future. Here, we provide interpretations and implementation considerations (choices and challenges) for each FAIR principle.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	10-29
Number of pages	20
Journal	Data Intelligence
Volume	2
Issue number	1-2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_00024
State	Published - Jan 1 2020
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Choices and challenges
FAIR communities
FAIR convergence
FAIR guiding principles
FAIR implementation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Information Systems
Computer Science Applications
Library and Information Sciences
Artificial Intelligence

Online availability

10.1162/dint_r_00024

Library availability

Discover UIUC Full Text

Cite this

Jacobsen, A., Azevedo, R. D. M., Juty, N., Batista, D., Coles, S., Cornet, R., Courtot, M., Crosas, M., Dumontier, M., Evelo, C. T., Goble, C., Guizzardi, G., Hansen, K. K., Hasnain, A., Hettne, K., Heringa, J., Hooft, R. W. W., Imming, M., Jeffery, K. G., ... Schultes, E. (2020). Fair principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations. Data Intelligence, 2(1-2), 10-29. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_00024

Jacobsen, A, Azevedo, RDM, Juty, N, Batista, D, Coles, S, Cornet, R, Courtot, M, Crosas, M, Dumontier, M, Evelo, CT, Goble, C, Guizzardi, G, Hansen, KK, Hasnain, A, Hettne, K, Heringa, J, Hooft, RWW, Imming, M, Jeffery, KG, Kaliyaperumal, R, Kersloot, MG, Kirkpatrick, CR, Kuhn, T, Labastida, I, Magagna, B, McQuilton, P, Meyers, N, Montesanti, A, van Reisen, M, Rocca-Serra, P, Pergl, R, Sansone, SA, Santos, LOBDS, Schneider, J, Strawn, G, Thompson, M, Waagmeester, A, Weigel, T, Wilkinson, MD, Willighagen, EL, Wittenburg, P, Roos, M, Mons, B & Schultes, E 2020, 'Fair principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations', Data Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 10-29. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_00024

@article{502c569d15b04567b2269558df8dd756,

title = "Fair principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations",

abstract = "The FAIR principles have been widely cited, endorsed and adopted by a broad range of stakeholders since their publication in 2016. By intention, the 15 FAIR guiding principles do not dictate specific technological implementations, but provide guidance for improving Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of digital resources. This has likely contributed to the broad adoption of the FAIR principles, because individual stakeholder communities can implement their own FAIR solutions. However, it has also resulted in inconsistent interpretations that carry the risk of leading to incompatible implementations. Thus, while the FAIR principles are formulated on a high level and may be interpreted and implemented in different ways, for true interoperability we need to support convergence in implementation choices that are widely accessible and (re)-usable. We introduce the concept of FAIR implementation considerations to assist accelerated global participation and convergence towards accessible, robust, widespread and consistent FAIR implementations. Any self-identified stakeholder community may either choose to reuse solutions from existing implementations, or when they spot a gap, accept the challenge to create the needed solution, which, ideally, can be used again by other communities in the future. Here, we provide interpretations and implementation considerations (choices and challenges) for each FAIR principle.",

keywords = "Choices and challenges, FAIR communities, FAIR convergence, FAIR guiding principles, FAIR implementation",

author = "Annika Jacobsen and Azevedo, {Ricardo de Miranda} and Nick Juty and Dominique Batista and Simon Coles and Ronald Cornet and M{\'e}lanie Courtot and Merc{\`e} Crosas and Michel Dumontier and Evelo, {Chris T.} and Carole Goble and Giancarlo Guizzardi and Hansen, {Karsten Kryger} and Ali Hasnain and Kristina Hettne and Jaap Heringa and Hooft, {Rob W.W.} and Melanie Imming and Jeffery, {Keith G.} and Rajaram Kaliyaperumal and Kersloot, {Martijn G.} and Kirkpatrick, {Christine R.} and Tobias Kuhn and Ignasi Labastida and Barbara Magagna and Peter McQuilton and Natalie Meyers and Annalisa Montesanti and {van Reisen}, Mirjam and Philippe Rocca-Serra and Robert Pergl and Sansone, {Susanna Assunta} and Santos, {Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva} and Juliane Schneider and George Strawn and Mark Thompson and Andra Waagmeester and Tobias Weigel and Wilkinson, {Mark D.} and Willighagen, {Egon L.} and Peter Wittenburg and Marco Roos and Barend Mons and Erik Schultes",

note = "Funding Information: The work of A. Jacobsen, C. Evelo, M. Thompson, R. Cornet, R. Kaliyaperuma and M. Roos is supported by funding from the European Union{\textquoteright}s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the EJP RD COFUND-EJP N° 825575. The work of A. Jacobsen, C. Evelo, C. Goble, M. Thompson, N. Juty, R. Hooft, M. Roos, S-A. Sansone, P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra and D. Batista is supported by funding from ELIXIR EXCELERATE, H2020 grant agreement number 676559. R. Hooft was further funded by NL NWO NRGWI. obrug.2018.009. N. Juty and C. Goble were funded by CORBEL (H2020 grant agreement 654248). N. Juty, C. Goble, S-A. Sansone, P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra and D. Batista were funded by FAIRplus (IMI grant agreement 802750). N. Juty, C. Goble, M. Thompson, M. Roos, S-A. Sansone, P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra and D. Batista were funded by EOSClife H2020-EU (grant agreement number 824087). C. Goble was funded by DMMCore (BBSRC BB/M013189/). M. Thompson, M. Roos received funding from NWO (VWData 400.17.605). S-A. Sansone, P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra and D. Batista have been funded by grants awarded to S-A. Sansone from the UK BBSRC and Research Councils (BB/L024101/1; BB/L005069/1), EU (H2020-EU 634107; H2020-EU 654241, IMI (IMPRiND 116060), NIH Data Common Fund, and from the Wellcome Trust (ISA-InterMine 212930/Z/18/Z; FAIRsharing 208381/A/17/Z). The work of A. Waagmeester has been funded by grant award number GM089820 from the National Institutes of Health. M. Kersloot was funded by the European Regional Development Fund (KVW-00163). The work of N. Meyers was funded by the National Science Foundation (OAC 1839030). The work of M.D. Wilkinson is funded by Isaac Peral/Marie Curie cofund with the Universidad Polit{\'e}cnica de Madrid and the Ministerio de Econom{\'i}a y Competitividad grant number TIN2014-55993-RM. The work of B. Magagna, E. Schultes, L. da Silva Santos and K. Jeffery is funded by the H2020-EU 824068. The work of B. Magagna, E. Schultes and L. da Silva Santos is funded by the GO FAIR ISCO grant of the Dutch Ministry of Science and Culture. The work of G. Guizzardi is supported by the OCEAN Project (FUB). M. Courtot received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 802750. R. Cornet was further funded by FAIR4Health (H2020-EU grant agreement number 824666). K. Jeffery received funding from EPOS-IP H2020-EU agreement 676564 and ENVRIplus H2020-EU agreement 654182. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Chinese Academy of Sciences Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.",

year = "2020",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1162/dint_r_00024",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2",

pages = "10--29",

journal = "Data Intelligence",

issn = "2096-7004",

publisher = "China National Publications Import and Export (Group) Corporation",

number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fair principles

T2 - Interpretations and implementation considerations

AU - Jacobsen, Annika

AU - Azevedo, Ricardo de Miranda

AU - Juty, Nick

AU - Batista, Dominique

AU - Coles, Simon

AU - Cornet, Ronald

AU - Courtot, Mélanie

AU - Crosas, Mercè

AU - Dumontier, Michel

AU - Evelo, Chris T.

AU - Goble, Carole

AU - Guizzardi, Giancarlo

AU - Hansen, Karsten Kryger

AU - Hasnain, Ali

AU - Hettne, Kristina

AU - Heringa, Jaap

AU - Hooft, Rob W.W.

AU - Imming, Melanie

AU - Jeffery, Keith G.

AU - Kaliyaperumal, Rajaram

AU - Kersloot, Martijn G.

AU - Kirkpatrick, Christine R.

AU - Kuhn, Tobias

AU - Labastida, Ignasi

AU - Magagna, Barbara

AU - McQuilton, Peter

AU - Meyers, Natalie

AU - Montesanti, Annalisa

AU - van Reisen, Mirjam

AU - Rocca-Serra, Philippe

AU - Pergl, Robert

AU - Sansone, Susanna Assunta

AU - Santos, Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva

AU - Schneider, Juliane

AU - Strawn, George

AU - Thompson, Mark

AU - Waagmeester, Andra

AU - Weigel, Tobias

AU - Wilkinson, Mark D.

AU - Willighagen, Egon L.

AU - Wittenburg, Peter

AU - Roos, Marco

AU - Mons, Barend

AU - Schultes, Erik

N1 - Funding Information: The work of A. Jacobsen, C. Evelo, M. Thompson, R. Cornet, R. Kaliyaperuma and M. Roos is supported by funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the EJP RD COFUND-EJP N° 825575. The work of A. Jacobsen, C. Evelo, C. Goble, M. Thompson, N. Juty, R. Hooft, M. Roos, S-A. Sansone, P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra and D. Batista is supported by funding from ELIXIR EXCELERATE, H2020 grant agreement number 676559. R. Hooft was further funded by NL NWO NRGWI. obrug.2018.009. N. Juty and C. Goble were funded by CORBEL (H2020 grant agreement 654248). N. Juty, C. Goble, S-A. Sansone, P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra and D. Batista were funded by FAIRplus (IMI grant agreement 802750). N. Juty, C. Goble, M. Thompson, M. Roos, S-A. Sansone, P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra and D. Batista were funded by EOSClife H2020-EU (grant agreement number 824087). C. Goble was funded by DMMCore (BBSRC BB/M013189/). M. Thompson, M. Roos received funding from NWO (VWData 400.17.605). S-A. Sansone, P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra and D. Batista have been funded by grants awarded to S-A. Sansone from the UK BBSRC and Research Councils (BB/L024101/1; BB/L005069/1), EU (H2020-EU 634107; H2020-EU 654241, IMI (IMPRiND 116060), NIH Data Common Fund, and from the Wellcome Trust (ISA-InterMine 212930/Z/18/Z; FAIRsharing 208381/A/17/Z). The work of A. Waagmeester has been funded by grant award number GM089820 from the National Institutes of Health. M. Kersloot was funded by the European Regional Development Fund (KVW-00163). The work of N. Meyers was funded by the National Science Foundation (OAC 1839030). The work of M.D. Wilkinson is funded by Isaac Peral/Marie Curie cofund with the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad grant number TIN2014-55993-RM. The work of B. Magagna, E. Schultes, L. da Silva Santos and K. Jeffery is funded by the H2020-EU 824068. The work of B. Magagna, E. Schultes and L. da Silva Santos is funded by the GO FAIR ISCO grant of the Dutch Ministry of Science and Culture. The work of G. Guizzardi is supported by the OCEAN Project (FUB). M. Courtot received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 802750. R. Cornet was further funded by FAIR4Health (H2020-EU grant agreement number 824666). K. Jeffery received funding from EPOS-IP H2020-EU agreement 676564 and ENVRIplus H2020-EU agreement 654182. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Chinese Academy of Sciences Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - The FAIR principles have been widely cited, endorsed and adopted by a broad range of stakeholders since their publication in 2016. By intention, the 15 FAIR guiding principles do not dictate specific technological implementations, but provide guidance for improving Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of digital resources. This has likely contributed to the broad adoption of the FAIR principles, because individual stakeholder communities can implement their own FAIR solutions. However, it has also resulted in inconsistent interpretations that carry the risk of leading to incompatible implementations. Thus, while the FAIR principles are formulated on a high level and may be interpreted and implemented in different ways, for true interoperability we need to support convergence in implementation choices that are widely accessible and (re)-usable. We introduce the concept of FAIR implementation considerations to assist accelerated global participation and convergence towards accessible, robust, widespread and consistent FAIR implementations. Any self-identified stakeholder community may either choose to reuse solutions from existing implementations, or when they spot a gap, accept the challenge to create the needed solution, which, ideally, can be used again by other communities in the future. Here, we provide interpretations and implementation considerations (choices and challenges) for each FAIR principle.

AB - The FAIR principles have been widely cited, endorsed and adopted by a broad range of stakeholders since their publication in 2016. By intention, the 15 FAIR guiding principles do not dictate specific technological implementations, but provide guidance for improving Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of digital resources. This has likely contributed to the broad adoption of the FAIR principles, because individual stakeholder communities can implement their own FAIR solutions. However, it has also resulted in inconsistent interpretations that carry the risk of leading to incompatible implementations. Thus, while the FAIR principles are formulated on a high level and may be interpreted and implemented in different ways, for true interoperability we need to support convergence in implementation choices that are widely accessible and (re)-usable. We introduce the concept of FAIR implementation considerations to assist accelerated global participation and convergence towards accessible, robust, widespread and consistent FAIR implementations. Any self-identified stakeholder community may either choose to reuse solutions from existing implementations, or when they spot a gap, accept the challenge to create the needed solution, which, ideally, can be used again by other communities in the future. Here, we provide interpretations and implementation considerations (choices and challenges) for each FAIR principle.

KW - Choices and challenges

KW - FAIR communities

KW - FAIR convergence

KW - FAIR guiding principles

KW - FAIR implementation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117812833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117812833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/dint_r_00024

DO - 10.1162/dint_r_00024

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85117812833

SN - 2096-7004

VL - 2

SP - 10

EP - 29

JO - Data Intelligence

JF - Data Intelligence

IS - 1-2

ER -

Fair principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Online availability

Library availability

Related links

Fingerprint

Cite this