TY - JOUR
T1 - Failure of Au RF-MEMS switches subjected to dynamic loading
AU - Kimberley, J.
AU - Cooney, R. S.
AU - Lambros, J.
AU - Chasiotis, I.
AU - Barker, N. S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the support of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and the U.S. Army Research Office under contract/grant number W911NF-05-1-0063 with Dr. B. LaMattina as the program manager, and the National Science Foundation under grant CMS-0555787.
PY - 2009/8/31
Y1 - 2009/8/31
N2 - The dynamic failure of Au RF-MEMS was investigated over a wide range of loading rates by three different experimental setups: a drop weight tower, which induced a maximum peak acceleration of 600g (g: acceleration of gravity), a Hopkinson pressure bar with a maximum peak acceleration of 300,000g, and a pulsed laser loading technique with a maximum peak acceleration of 1.8 × 108g. In the drop weight tower the total load pulse duration was in the milliseconds range - much longer than the 28 μs resonant period of the devices - and no failure of any kind occurred in the RF-MEMS devices or their substrate. At 90,000g (generated in the Hopkinson bar) no damage in either the substrate or the devices was observed. However, at 200,000g, which corresponds to a loading duration of a few microseconds, i.e., comparable to the device resonant period, 10% of the switches failed although postmortem imaging showed no damage to the substrate. Damage increased after this acceleration and at 300,000g 20% of the switches failed, but, in addition, significant failure in the quartz substrate was recorded. Lastly, the pulsed laser loading technique, which has a loading pulse duration of a few tens of nanoseconds, was applied to accelerate the Au switches to 1.8 × 108g, and the probability of failure at this loading ranged from 50% to 80%. At even larger accelerations, 109g, the probability of failure was 100%. The results of this study establish the severity of dynamic failure in MEMS, despite their small mass, and its dependence on the level of acceleration which spanned about 7 orders of magnitude.
AB - The dynamic failure of Au RF-MEMS was investigated over a wide range of loading rates by three different experimental setups: a drop weight tower, which induced a maximum peak acceleration of 600g (g: acceleration of gravity), a Hopkinson pressure bar with a maximum peak acceleration of 300,000g, and a pulsed laser loading technique with a maximum peak acceleration of 1.8 × 108g. In the drop weight tower the total load pulse duration was in the milliseconds range - much longer than the 28 μs resonant period of the devices - and no failure of any kind occurred in the RF-MEMS devices or their substrate. At 90,000g (generated in the Hopkinson bar) no damage in either the substrate or the devices was observed. However, at 200,000g, which corresponds to a loading duration of a few microseconds, i.e., comparable to the device resonant period, 10% of the switches failed although postmortem imaging showed no damage to the substrate. Damage increased after this acceleration and at 300,000g 20% of the switches failed, but, in addition, significant failure in the quartz substrate was recorded. Lastly, the pulsed laser loading technique, which has a loading pulse duration of a few tens of nanoseconds, was applied to accelerate the Au switches to 1.8 × 108g, and the probability of failure at this loading ranged from 50% to 80%. At even larger accelerations, 109g, the probability of failure was 100%. The results of this study establish the severity of dynamic failure in MEMS, despite their small mass, and its dependence on the level of acceleration which spanned about 7 orders of magnitude.
KW - Dynamic failure
KW - High strain rate
KW - Hopkinson bar
KW - Pulsed laser
KW - RF-MEMS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68849103204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68849103204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.sna.2009.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.sna.2009.06.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:68849103204
SN - 0924-4247
VL - 154
SP - 140
EP - 148
JO - Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
JF - Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
IS - 1
ER -