Faculty perceptions and readership patterns of finance journals: A global view

Elisabeth Oltheten, Vasilis Theoharakis, Nickolaos G. Travlos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Journal rankings are frequently used as a measure of both journal and author research quality. Nonetheless, debates frequently arise because journal rankings do not take into account the underlying diversity of the finance research community. This study examines how factors such as a researcher's geographic origin, research interests, seniority, and journal affiliation influence journal quality perceptions and readership patterns. Based on a worldwide sample of 862 finance academics, we find remarkable consistency in the rankings of top journals. For the remaining journals, perception of journal quality differs depending on the researcher's geographic origin, research interests, seniority, and journal affiliation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-239
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Faculty perceptions and readership patterns of finance journals: A global view'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this