Factors Associated With Involvement in Nonmetropolitan LGBTQ Organizations: Proximity? Generativity? Minority Stress? Social Location?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Little is known about involvement in LGBTQ organizations. Factors associated with involvement in nonmetropolitan LGBTQ organizations were examined using logistic regression and survey data from 426 LGBTQ individuals residing in a nonmetropolitan region. Involvement was examined in five types of organizations (professional, social/recreational, religious, political, and community center/charity). The same model testing proximity, generativity, minority stress, and social location hypotheses was repeated for each organization type. Results demonstrate that the generativity hypothesis is most strongly supported. Indeed, emotional attachment to the LGBTQ community significantly increased the odds of involvement in every type of organization. However, the factors associated with involvement otherwise differed by organization type. Implications for organizational leaders are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1481-1500
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Homosexuality
Volume61
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2014

Fingerprint

minority
Organizations
type of organization
political center
Charities
community center
organization
Logistic Models
logistics
leader
regression
community

Keywords

  • bisexual
  • community involvement
  • gay
  • generativity
  • lesbian
  • minority stress
  • proximity
  • queer
  • social location
  • transgender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{f44d77a5616741e5935c97d2ffba412b,
title = "Factors Associated With Involvement in Nonmetropolitan LGBTQ Organizations: Proximity? Generativity? Minority Stress? Social Location?",
abstract = "Little is known about involvement in LGBTQ organizations. Factors associated with involvement in nonmetropolitan LGBTQ organizations were examined using logistic regression and survey data from 426 LGBTQ individuals residing in a nonmetropolitan region. Involvement was examined in five types of organizations (professional, social/recreational, religious, political, and community center/charity). The same model testing proximity, generativity, minority stress, and social location hypotheses was repeated for each organization type. Results demonstrate that the generativity hypothesis is most strongly supported. Indeed, emotional attachment to the LGBTQ community significantly increased the odds of involvement in every type of organization. However, the factors associated with involvement otherwise differed by organization type. Implications for organizational leaders are discussed.",
keywords = "bisexual, community involvement, gay, generativity, lesbian, minority stress, proximity, queer, social location, transgender",
author = "Paceley, {Megan S.} and Oswald, {Ramona Faith} and Hardesty, {Jennifer Leeann}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/00918369.2014.928582",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "1481--1500",
journal = "Journal of Homosexuality",
issn = "0091-8369",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors Associated With Involvement in Nonmetropolitan LGBTQ Organizations

T2 - Proximity? Generativity? Minority Stress? Social Location?

AU - Paceley, Megan S.

AU - Oswald, Ramona Faith

AU - Hardesty, Jennifer Leeann

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - Little is known about involvement in LGBTQ organizations. Factors associated with involvement in nonmetropolitan LGBTQ organizations were examined using logistic regression and survey data from 426 LGBTQ individuals residing in a nonmetropolitan region. Involvement was examined in five types of organizations (professional, social/recreational, religious, political, and community center/charity). The same model testing proximity, generativity, minority stress, and social location hypotheses was repeated for each organization type. Results demonstrate that the generativity hypothesis is most strongly supported. Indeed, emotional attachment to the LGBTQ community significantly increased the odds of involvement in every type of organization. However, the factors associated with involvement otherwise differed by organization type. Implications for organizational leaders are discussed.

AB - Little is known about involvement in LGBTQ organizations. Factors associated with involvement in nonmetropolitan LGBTQ organizations were examined using logistic regression and survey data from 426 LGBTQ individuals residing in a nonmetropolitan region. Involvement was examined in five types of organizations (professional, social/recreational, religious, political, and community center/charity). The same model testing proximity, generativity, minority stress, and social location hypotheses was repeated for each organization type. Results demonstrate that the generativity hypothesis is most strongly supported. Indeed, emotional attachment to the LGBTQ community significantly increased the odds of involvement in every type of organization. However, the factors associated with involvement otherwise differed by organization type. Implications for organizational leaders are discussed.

KW - bisexual

KW - community involvement

KW - gay

KW - generativity

KW - lesbian

KW - minority stress

KW - proximity

KW - queer

KW - social location

KW - transgender

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905104300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905104300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00918369.2014.928582

DO - 10.1080/00918369.2014.928582

M3 - Article

C2 - 24885159

AN - SCOPUS:84905104300

VL - 61

SP - 1481

EP - 1500

JO - Journal of Homosexuality

JF - Journal of Homosexuality

SN - 0091-8369

IS - 10

ER -