Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: comparison between peer- and instructor-redirection

Eunjung Oh, Wen-Hao Huang, Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, Boreum Ju

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore and compare learners’ critical thinking and interaction during an asynchronous online discussion when peer- or instructor-facilitation was provided. Current literature on online discussion reveals a controversy between peer facilitation and instructor facilitation regarding their strengths and weaknesses. However, the effect of peer-facilitation on critical thinking learning outcome has not been clearly discussed. Situated in a graduate-level program evaluation course, the learners engaged in a debate using a scenario-based case on ethical decision-making. A content analysis of discussion using the Cognitive Presence framework and a social network analysis revealed a significant difference between peer-redirected group and instructor-redirected group in their cognitive presence as well as in interaction dynamic upon receiving the redirection message. Based on findings regarding cognitive presence level, interaction dynamic and perspective change on the debate topic in each group, a peer-facilitation approach is more effective for fostering critical thinking and collaborative discourse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-509
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Computing in Higher Education
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

instructor
interaction
peer group
network analysis
content analysis
social network
Group
graduate
scenario
decision making
discourse
evaluation
learning
literature

Keywords

  • Asynchronous online discussion
  • Critical thinking
  • Facilitation strategies
  • Interaction dynamic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion : comparison between peer- and instructor-redirection. / Oh, Eunjung; Huang, Wen-Hao; Hedayati Mehdiabadi, Amir; Ju, Boreum.

In: Journal of Computing in Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.12.2018, p. 489-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e16248df55b54a2fb9cced819649e88f,
title = "Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: comparison between peer- and instructor-redirection",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to explore and compare learners’ critical thinking and interaction during an asynchronous online discussion when peer- or instructor-facilitation was provided. Current literature on online discussion reveals a controversy between peer facilitation and instructor facilitation regarding their strengths and weaknesses. However, the effect of peer-facilitation on critical thinking learning outcome has not been clearly discussed. Situated in a graduate-level program evaluation course, the learners engaged in a debate using a scenario-based case on ethical decision-making. A content analysis of discussion using the Cognitive Presence framework and a social network analysis revealed a significant difference between peer-redirected group and instructor-redirected group in their cognitive presence as well as in interaction dynamic upon receiving the redirection message. Based on findings regarding cognitive presence level, interaction dynamic and perspective change on the debate topic in each group, a peer-facilitation approach is more effective for fostering critical thinking and collaborative discourse.",
keywords = "Asynchronous online discussion, Critical thinking, Facilitation strategies, Interaction dynamic",
author = "Eunjung Oh and Wen-Hao Huang and {Hedayati Mehdiabadi}, Amir and Boreum Ju",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "489--509",
journal = "Journal of Computing in Higher Education",
issn = "1042-1726",
publisher = "Paideia Publishers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion

T2 - comparison between peer- and instructor-redirection

AU - Oh, Eunjung

AU - Huang, Wen-Hao

AU - Hedayati Mehdiabadi, Amir

AU - Ju, Boreum

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to explore and compare learners’ critical thinking and interaction during an asynchronous online discussion when peer- or instructor-facilitation was provided. Current literature on online discussion reveals a controversy between peer facilitation and instructor facilitation regarding their strengths and weaknesses. However, the effect of peer-facilitation on critical thinking learning outcome has not been clearly discussed. Situated in a graduate-level program evaluation course, the learners engaged in a debate using a scenario-based case on ethical decision-making. A content analysis of discussion using the Cognitive Presence framework and a social network analysis revealed a significant difference between peer-redirected group and instructor-redirected group in their cognitive presence as well as in interaction dynamic upon receiving the redirection message. Based on findings regarding cognitive presence level, interaction dynamic and perspective change on the debate topic in each group, a peer-facilitation approach is more effective for fostering critical thinking and collaborative discourse.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to explore and compare learners’ critical thinking and interaction during an asynchronous online discussion when peer- or instructor-facilitation was provided. Current literature on online discussion reveals a controversy between peer facilitation and instructor facilitation regarding their strengths and weaknesses. However, the effect of peer-facilitation on critical thinking learning outcome has not been clearly discussed. Situated in a graduate-level program evaluation course, the learners engaged in a debate using a scenario-based case on ethical decision-making. A content analysis of discussion using the Cognitive Presence framework and a social network analysis revealed a significant difference between peer-redirected group and instructor-redirected group in their cognitive presence as well as in interaction dynamic upon receiving the redirection message. Based on findings regarding cognitive presence level, interaction dynamic and perspective change on the debate topic in each group, a peer-facilitation approach is more effective for fostering critical thinking and collaborative discourse.

KW - Asynchronous online discussion

KW - Critical thinking

KW - Facilitation strategies

KW - Interaction dynamic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055329930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055329930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6

DO - 10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055329930

VL - 30

SP - 489

EP - 509

JO - Journal of Computing in Higher Education

JF - Journal of Computing in Higher Education

SN - 1042-1726

IS - 3

ER -