Facebook's Afterlife

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

People spend an increasing part of their lives using Facebook and other online social networking sites. However, virtually no law regulates what happens to a person’s online existence after his or her death. This is true even though individuals have privacy interests in materials they post to social networking sites; such sites are repositories of intellectual property, as well as materials important to family members and friends; and historians of the future will depend upon digital archives to reconstruct the past. In the absence of legal regulation, social networking sites determine on their own what, if anything, to do with a deceased user’s account and the materials the user posted to the site. Yet allowing social networking sites to set their own policies with respect to decedents’ accounts does not adequately protect the individual and collective interests at stake. The law, particularly federal law, can and should play a stronger role in regulating social networking sites and in determining the contours of our digital afterlives.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number11
Pages (from-to)1643-1686
Number of pages44
JournalNorth Carolina Law Review
Volume90
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Social Networking
Intellectual Property
Privacy

Keywords

  • Facebook
  • digital assets
  • Social Networking
  • deceased users
  • intellectual property assets
  • wills
  • online accounts
  • digital afterlife

Cite this

Facebook's Afterlife. / Mazzone, Jason.

In: North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 5, 11, 2012, p. 1643-1686.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mazzone, J 2012, 'Facebook's Afterlife', North Carolina Law Review, vol. 90, no. 5, 11, pp. 1643-1686.
Mazzone, Jason. / Facebook's Afterlife. In: North Carolina Law Review. 2012 ; Vol. 90, No. 5. pp. 1643-1686.
@article{4a75c66defdb45698ac97f77ddfb19c2,
title = "Facebook's Afterlife",
abstract = "People spend an increasing part of their lives using Facebook and other online social networking sites. However, virtually no law regulates what happens to a person’s online existence after his or her death. This is true even though individuals have privacy interests in materials they post to social networking sites; such sites are repositories of intellectual property, as well as materials important to family members and friends; and historians of the future will depend upon digital archives to reconstruct the past. In the absence of legal regulation, social networking sites determine on their own what, if anything, to do with a deceased user’s account and the materials the user posted to the site. Yet allowing social networking sites to set their own policies with respect to decedents’ accounts does not adequately protect the individual and collective interests at stake. The law, particularly federal law, can and should play a stronger role in regulating social networking sites and in determining the contours of our digital afterlives.",
keywords = "Facebook, digital assets, Social Networking, deceased users, intellectual property assets, wills, online accounts, digital afterlife",
author = "Jason Mazzone",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "1643--1686",
journal = "North Carolina Law Review",
issn = "0029-2524",
publisher = "North Carolina Law Review Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facebook's Afterlife

AU - Mazzone, Jason

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - People spend an increasing part of their lives using Facebook and other online social networking sites. However, virtually no law regulates what happens to a person’s online existence after his or her death. This is true even though individuals have privacy interests in materials they post to social networking sites; such sites are repositories of intellectual property, as well as materials important to family members and friends; and historians of the future will depend upon digital archives to reconstruct the past. In the absence of legal regulation, social networking sites determine on their own what, if anything, to do with a deceased user’s account and the materials the user posted to the site. Yet allowing social networking sites to set their own policies with respect to decedents’ accounts does not adequately protect the individual and collective interests at stake. The law, particularly federal law, can and should play a stronger role in regulating social networking sites and in determining the contours of our digital afterlives.

AB - People spend an increasing part of their lives using Facebook and other online social networking sites. However, virtually no law regulates what happens to a person’s online existence after his or her death. This is true even though individuals have privacy interests in materials they post to social networking sites; such sites are repositories of intellectual property, as well as materials important to family members and friends; and historians of the future will depend upon digital archives to reconstruct the past. In the absence of legal regulation, social networking sites determine on their own what, if anything, to do with a deceased user’s account and the materials the user posted to the site. Yet allowing social networking sites to set their own policies with respect to decedents’ accounts does not adequately protect the individual and collective interests at stake. The law, particularly federal law, can and should play a stronger role in regulating social networking sites and in determining the contours of our digital afterlives.

KW - Facebook

KW - digital assets

KW - Social Networking

KW - deceased users

KW - intellectual property assets

KW - wills

KW - online accounts

KW - digital afterlife

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 1643

EP - 1686

JO - North Carolina Law Review

JF - North Carolina Law Review

SN - 0029-2524

IS - 5

M1 - 11

ER -