TY - JOUR
T1 - Extinction after fear memory reactivation fails to eliminate renewal in rats
AU - Goode, Travis D.
AU - Holloway-Erickson, Crystal M.
AU - Maren, Stephen
N1 - Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01MH065961 to S.M. and F31MH107113 to T.D.G.) and a McKnight Foundation Memory and Cognitive Disorders Award to S.M.
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Retrieving fear memories just prior to extinction has been reported to effectively erase fear memories and prevent fear relapse. The current study examined whether the type of retrieval procedure influences the ability of extinction to impair fear renewal, a form of relapse in which responding to a conditional stimulus (CS) returns outside of the extinction context. Rats first underwent Pavlovian fear conditioning with an auditory CS and footshock unconditional stimulus (US); freezing behavior served as the index of conditioned fear. Twenty-four hours later, the rats underwent a retrieval-extinction procedure. Specifically, 1 h prior to extinction (45 CS-alone trials; 44 for rats receiving a CS reminder), fear memory was retrieved by either a single exposure to the CS alone, the US alone, a CS paired with the US, or exposure to the conditioning context itself. Over the next few days, conditional freezing to the extinguished CS was tested in the extinction and conditioning context in that order (i.e., an ABBA design). In the extinction context, rats that received a CS + US trial before extinction exhibited higher levels of conditional freezing than animals in all other groups, which did not differ from one another. In the renewal context, all groups showed renewal, and none of the reactivation procedures reduced renewal relative to a control group that did not receive a reactivation procedure prior to extinction. These data suggest retrieval-extinction procedures may have limited efficacy in preventing fear renewal.
AB - Retrieving fear memories just prior to extinction has been reported to effectively erase fear memories and prevent fear relapse. The current study examined whether the type of retrieval procedure influences the ability of extinction to impair fear renewal, a form of relapse in which responding to a conditional stimulus (CS) returns outside of the extinction context. Rats first underwent Pavlovian fear conditioning with an auditory CS and footshock unconditional stimulus (US); freezing behavior served as the index of conditioned fear. Twenty-four hours later, the rats underwent a retrieval-extinction procedure. Specifically, 1 h prior to extinction (45 CS-alone trials; 44 for rats receiving a CS reminder), fear memory was retrieved by either a single exposure to the CS alone, the US alone, a CS paired with the US, or exposure to the conditioning context itself. Over the next few days, conditional freezing to the extinguished CS was tested in the extinction and conditioning context in that order (i.e., an ABBA design). In the extinction context, rats that received a CS + US trial before extinction exhibited higher levels of conditional freezing than animals in all other groups, which did not differ from one another. In the renewal context, all groups showed renewal, and none of the reactivation procedures reduced renewal relative to a control group that did not receive a reactivation procedure prior to extinction. These data suggest retrieval-extinction procedures may have limited efficacy in preventing fear renewal.
KW - Context
KW - Extinction
KW - Fear
KW - Postretrieval extinction
KW - Rat
KW - Reconsolidation
KW - Relapse
KW - Renewal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014827667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014827667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.03.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 28274824
AN - SCOPUS:85014827667
SN - 1074-7427
VL - 142
SP - 41
EP - 47
JO - Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
JF - Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
ER -