TY - JOUR
T1 - Extended Time Accommodation and the Academic, Behavioral, and Psychological Outcomes of Students With Learning Disabilities
AU - Wei, Xin
AU - Zhang, Susu
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R324P210005 to SRI International. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2023.
PY - 2023/8/30
Y1 - 2023/8/30
N2 - This study analyzed performance, process, and survey data of eighth graders with learning disabilities (LDs) who took the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) digital math test. Compared with students with LDs who did not receive extended time accommodations (ETAs), students with LDs who received and used ETA scored significantly higher on the test, whereas students with LDs who received but did not use ETA scored significantly lower on the test. In addition, students with LDs in the two ETA groups reported a lower level of perceived time pressure and a higher level of math interest and enjoyment than their peers who did not receive ETA. For students with LDs who received ETA, optimal performance was achieved with 50% additional time, while their peers who did not receive ETA typically performed best when utilizing most of their allotted time. The analysis of process data revealed that students with LDs who used ETA performed more actions, had a higher number of revisits, used universal design digital tools more frequently, and performed better on time-consuming items than their peers who did not receive ETA at the same level of math performance.
AB - This study analyzed performance, process, and survey data of eighth graders with learning disabilities (LDs) who took the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) digital math test. Compared with students with LDs who did not receive extended time accommodations (ETAs), students with LDs who received and used ETA scored significantly higher on the test, whereas students with LDs who received but did not use ETA scored significantly lower on the test. In addition, students with LDs in the two ETA groups reported a lower level of perceived time pressure and a higher level of math interest and enjoyment than their peers who did not receive ETA. For students with LDs who received ETA, optimal performance was achieved with 50% additional time, while their peers who did not receive ETA typically performed best when utilizing most of their allotted time. The analysis of process data revealed that students with LDs who used ETA performed more actions, had a higher number of revisits, used universal design digital tools more frequently, and performed better on time-consuming items than their peers who did not receive ETA at the same level of math performance.
KW - extended time accommodation
KW - learning disabilities
KW - math attitude
KW - math performance
KW - NAEP
KW - process data
KW - test-taking behavior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169914220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85169914220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00222194231195624
DO - 10.1177/00222194231195624
M3 - Article
C2 - 37649364
AN - SCOPUS:85169914220
SN - 0022-2194
VL - 57
SP - 242
EP - 254
JO - Journal of Learning Disabilities
JF - Journal of Learning Disabilities
IS - 4
ER -